Egregoros · Phoenix Framework

Post

Remote status

Context

Only 3 Easy Payments of $19.95

Trans isn't even recognized as a protected class under the Equal Protection Clause (United States v. Skrmetti) so why would the Supreme Court rule that you MUST allow someone to play in a gender segregated sport based on what they identify as?

People out here like WOW SUPREME COURT BAD, HOW COULD THEY

georgia

@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz remote

@feld I'm seeing a lot of outrage based on Thomas's opinion that being trans isnt an immutable characteristic

Only 3 Easy Payments of $19.95

@feld@friedcheese.us remote

@georgia it's hard to swallow but he's not wrong. A not insignificant number of people de-transition which means it's obviously not an immutable characteristic.

It sucks but it's true.

Blurry Moon

@sun@shitposter.world remote

@feld @georgia I'm not trying to attac trans people but its just obviously also true that you literally can't know without talking to a person, and then you can't derive intent why someone says they are, why they transitioned, or why they detransitioned. if you can frame this as an immutable characteristic that would be insanely weird

🌲

@scathach@stereophonic.space remote

@sun @feld @georgia Unfortunately it absolutely is an immutable characteristic

Blurry Moon

@sun@shitposter.world remote

@scathach @feld @georgia it is but it's also not one that can really be externally tested which is a really important legal prerequisite in a lot of cases.

🌲

@scathach@stereophonic.space remote

@sun @feld @georgia There is a little bit of research indicating it could be externally tested whether or not someone is trans with fMRI brain scans but last I checked nobody it hasn't been seriously pursued

georgia

@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz remote

@scathach @feld @sun there is also even more compelling overlapping evidence of "gay brain"

Tears for Keirs

@MossGrowsOnNormanRuins@defcon.social remote

@georgia @feld @sun@shitposter.world @scathach the backslide from normie cishet liberals i knew irl in 2019 going "oh i heard trans people have a different shaped brain from the rest of the gender they were born as, that makes sense" and even conversatives agreeing begrudgingly to that to 2020s era "gender is just a feeling" feels so frustrating

georgia

@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz remote

@MossGrowsOnNormanRuins @feld @scathach the idea that gender is just a feeling plays directly into transphobic hands tbh

existential threat

@ikeWren@kill-corporations.enterprises remote

@georgia @MossGrowsOnNormanRuins @feld @scathach yeah i agree that "gender is a feeling" is reductive and counterproductive but i also think that the neuroscience of gender is kinda dubious , lowkey eugenics-coded , and reinforces the psychiatric-state-industrial complex so i do think that we ought to use something somewhat better . same thing for the "gay brain" . using these things is not conducive to a liberatory biopolitics . my foundational text for this is "American Eugenics" by Nancy Ordover , i highly highly recommend it

Tears for Keirs

@MossGrowsOnNormanRuins@defcon.social remote

@ikeWren @feld @georgia @scathach

i routinely get shit for saying there's some scientific basis for a modern day re-evaluation of phrenology. imo regardless of whether or not we want to acknowledge that there's a gay brain and a straight brain based on what political utility it existing would have, there still will be a gay brain and a straight brain

existential threat

@ikeWren@kill-corporations.enterprises remote

@MossGrowsOnNormanRuins @feld @georgia @scathach part of the issue is that i just categorically disagree with the idea that there is objectively a gay brain and a straight brain lol , i have not seen any science that is sufficiently convincing to prove this and to my knowledge we have such a poor understanding of what's even going on in there to say that gay and straight cognition and behavior emerge from some preexisting condition of the brain or whether some other shit is going on . maybe im wrong about this and there's some new science about it since then that somehow proves this but it's all very dubious to me

Only 3 Easy Payments of $19.95

@feld@friedcheese.us remote

@ikeWren @MossGrowsOnNormanRuins @georgia @scathach

> part of the issue is that i just categorically disagree with the idea that there is objectively a gay brain and a straight brain

But why? We accept that brain chemistry/hormone balance does all sorts of things to humans, so why wouldn't this most likely be a significant factor?

existential threat

@ikeWren@kill-corporations.enterprises remote

@feld @MossGrowsOnNormanRuins @georgia @scathach i take issue with the idea that there can be some static neural predisposition to complex behaviors like sexuality . shit like emotional dysregulation or sex drive are pretty simple in comparison, but sexual and gender orientation involve a lot of extremely complex social and cultural context and it's not like xyz neurotransmitter can change all that

existential threat

@ikeWren@kill-corporations.enterprises remote

@feld @MossGrowsOnNormanRuins @georgia @scathach justifying things by their naturalness is stupid and regressive and im tired of pretending that neurological determinism is progressive . it isnt and it never has been just like any kind of determinism . i dont really care if being gay or trans is a choice or not because everyone should be able to choose to Do gay or trans regardless . the glorification of ‘nature’ has nothing to offer us

Tears for Keirs

@MossGrowsOnNormanRuins@defcon.social remote

@ikeWren @feld @georgia @scathach this is just a woke rework of the homophobic argument about how gay people choose to be gay and could stop if they wanted to, I don't have the choice to not be attracted to men and straight men don't have the choice to be attracted to men.

Literally just a day or two ago Clarence Thomas made the argument that transness is a choice that anyone can make or not make and not an immutable characteristic as justification for stripping trans people of their further rights.

Replying to @MossGrowsOnNormanRuins@defcon.social

Tears for Keirs

@MossGrowsOnNormanRuins@defcon.social remote

@ikeWren @feld @georgia @scathach tbc I don't think this argument in itself is a good argument for it existing or not, just to make it clear that it's also not a politically progressive stance to take either that anybody can be anything

Replies

Fetching replies…