People out here like WOW SUPREME COURT BAD, HOW COULD THEY
Post
Remote status
Context
19People out here like WOW SUPREME COURT BAD, HOW COULD THEY
It sucks but it's true.
@georgia @feld @sun@shitposter.world @scathach the backslide from normie cishet liberals i knew irl in 2019 going "oh i heard trans people have a different shaped brain from the rest of the gender they were born as, that makes sense" and even conversatives agreeing begrudgingly to that to 2020s era "gender is just a feeling" feels so frustrating
@anokasion @feld @georgia @scathach
sexual attraction comes about because of the genetics and environment (ie early hormonal exposure) of each individual, e.g. there's a statistically significant difference in the ratio of finger lengths and facial ratios between men attracted solely to women and men attracted to other men even before these sexual feelings develop
couple of studies i found on differences in body structure based on male sexuality:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12872893/
@MossGrowsOnNormanRuins @anokasion @feld @georgia @scathach girl u gotta stop w the phrenology its not a great look
@fiore @feld @anokasion @georgia @scathach everytime this thread comes up the only argument i get back is "I think this is politically inconvenient so if you don't pretend it's not real you're a bad person" and "this discussion gives me the ick"
@MossGrowsOnNormanRuins @feld @anokasion @georgia @scathach nobody said that and youre ignoring the actuaol points people are making but whatever man you do you i suppose . go agree with the chud for all i care see where taht gets you
@fiore @feld @anokasion @georgia @scathach how is saying "you've got to stop with this it's a bad look" not "this discussion gives me the ick"
@MossGrowsOnNormanRuins @feld @anokasion @georgia @scathach i have argued this before with you youre clearly not interested in having a good faith conversation about it so im not even gonna waste words youre right
@fiore @feld @anokasion @georgia @scathach the good faith conversation from last time condensed: 'this study with >200,000 participants isnt statistically significant, and if it is we should deny it's real anyway for political convenience and if you object you're cringe'
@MossGrowsOnNormanRuins @feld @anokasion @georgia @scathach if thats what you took from it im afraid theres no real point in arguing here . also youre being rlly mean to me and i rlly dont respond well to me given my 1.345% excess in forearm hair growth rate , indicative of general incapacity to argue with someone . if you read the study by dr. Racist McNazis on the matter where he conveniently omits the statistical analysis only pointing numbers and saying โoogabooga number big = correlationโ youd know how serious this is .
@fiore @feld @anokasion @georgia @scathach im going to be real I can't remember what you specifically said in that thread bcs there were numerous different people in it arguing against me, and my posts autodelete after a while so i cant find it to reread it now
Replies
8@fiore @feld @anokasion @georgia @scathach also the "I have X trait so I'm Y and so is everyone else with X trait" thing is a ridiculous straw man and I've never said stuff like that, I think in a large population of people who are Y, X trait will be slightly more pronounced and the centre of the bell curve will skew slightly off what the norm is, also maybe people with a very pronounced X trait could be Z% more likely to be Y than people with a normal X trait.
@MossGrowsOnNormanRuins @feld @anokasion @georgia @scathach 0 predictive power means it is not science and it is in fact useless . furthermore , 0 theoretical links between the obsesrved trait and the implied characteristic means not only it is useles , but also very easily disproven . the fact that nobody bothered to do so is just because the first part of this post already rendered it a joke so why even bother .
@fiore @feld @anokasion @georgia @scathach there's a big gap between "100% of the population with a 2D:4D ratio over 1.000 are gay" and the claim that there's 0 predictive power. The reality is that gay men have an x% higher mean 2D:4D ratio and are much more homogeneous worldwide whereas there's far more regional difference between straight men.
It's the same way we can say "not everyone with white skin has European genetic heritage and not everyone with European genetic heritage has white skin, but they're far more likely to than the average person worldwide"
@georgia @MossGrowsOnNormanRuins @feld @anokasion @scathach whats that
@MossGrowsOnNormanRuins @feld @anokasion @georgia @scathach >blanchard
what are we even saying here , man