Egregoros

@cjd @admin @KekistaniWanderer @Terry @TrevorGoodchild see my post a few days ago about “having plans to do things”

the main problem with the current crop of emotive dipshits is that their one-shot and disorganized “plans” (I use this term loosely) accomplish less than nothing, because the system already knows that those occurrences are (1) statistically guaranteed at a certain rate, (2) are one-and-done, and (3) can be made to serve their own purposes; as soon as the perpetrator gets rolled up, the system has nothing left to fear, and it can then convert the Happening of a “brief emotive flash-in-the-pan challenge to the system” into the sweet lemonade of “public reinforcement of the Myth of Systemic Invulnerability” (“the Pinkertons always get their man”), thereby converting what is essentially an evolutionary input (culling the weak and stupid among their servants and goading the rest into better habits) into a net benefit for the system as a whole

when there becomes systemic uncertainty about whether or not they’ll be able to stop the next called shot, or exact retribution for it in any meaningful way…. that, right there, is when Nature begins to Heal

Most bombs are surprisingly ineffective because they're not HUGE, and most things survive explosions fairly well. Shootings have much higher lethality than bombings, for example.

Two counter-examples:
1. Mining a navigable river - because you punch a hole in a 20mn$ boat and put it on the bottom of the river, blocking any other boats from passing until it's cleaned up.
2. Air-fuel bombs - particularly propane tanks because they have compressive energy which pushes the fuel out once whatever explosive fractures the tank, and they also have a lot of chemical energy. You need a separate ignition source from the primary explosive, e.g. a road flare. Bonus points if you fill the tank 1/4 full of diesel before charging it with propane, because the diesel and liquid propane will dissolve together and when it goes out, it carries diesel mist with it.

On another topic: Private jets are INSANELY vulnerable to small infrared-seeking rockets if they're near the airport.

BTW: Doing this stuff is of course illegal, but talking about it isn't, and BUYING THE MATERIALS isn't either. And it jams up surveillance systems. Home made fireworks = civil disobedience...

If American whites weren't biologically incompatible with communism (descendants of explorers, risk takers, or individualistic shady characters seeing a new country as a piggybank full of suckers, that's the 3rd wave of white immigration lbh) America would be primed for communist revolution by now. And i don't mean gay tranny nigger mamdani hasan piker destiny bullshit. I mean my old man and his family rolling "the people's armored battalions" of Abraams tanks down wall street and executing anyone with a suit worth more than 200 dollars.

There is a kid at work that already has one kid and he has a second on the way but he orders DoorDash every single day for lunch at a minimum of $20 per day That's $100 a week and in 10 months by the time his baby is born He will have spent $4,000 on lunch and I tried to explain to him that $20 will make you sandwiches for an entire week but he just doesn't get it he is young and stupid.
But then again he is also Hispanic so he probably has a lower IQ than all the white people that bring their own lunch everyday

Im not imagining anyone. Ive yet to find a boomer especialy an American to tell me why zoomers and millenials (im genx forget about me) shouldn't demand the same value for the same workhours adjusted for inflation/cost of living of course, that the boomers had? And if that is impossible today, why the fuck won't all these scumbags on line and on tv both regular boomers and people of the system of boomer age, stop saying its a personal responsibility issue for the young when its obviously a systemic issue? And why all of them talk to the working class of today's America from the pulpit of television and social media, as if they re slaves that should just eat soylent green and be thankful.

> Im not imagining anyone. Ive yet to find a boomer especialy an American to tell me why zoomers and millenials (im genx forget about me) shouldn't demand the same value for the same workhours adjusted for inflation/cost of living of course, that the boomers had?

Because that would be antisemitic. No, I've never heard one actually say so, but that's what it all comes down to.

> And if that is impossible today, why the fuck won't all these scumbags on line and on tv both regular boomers and people of the system of boomer age, stop saying its a personal responsibility issue for the young when its obviously a systemic issue?

Because the concept of compounded inflation is completely beyond them.

@thragg @Terry @KekistaniWanderer I'm just saying don't say you're going to take all their stuff when you're not going to, since people have been saying for years they're going to take all their stuff and never have.

The successful movements like that always have significant backing. But it's been Soros who's been backing them for the other team. For the rest of us, the productive option is to do what the Mennonites, Hutterites, Amish have done. Piss off to your own spot and try to draw as little attention as possible.

@thragg @Terry @KekistaniWanderer No, it's not appealing at all. It's boring, takes hundreds of years, everyone shits on you for running away, and you get to enjoy none of the payoff. But the Hutterites et al are much closer to inheriting the world, or at least their world, than you or I. They have land, money, resources, population growth, so it works. Conquering also works, but requires having more power and resources than the other side, which is currently lacking. So if the option is to win, and not just feel good, it requires the long game.