Timeline
Post
Remote status
Replies
31
>eating out
Even when I can afford it I don't
Every place around here is filled with tables of loud, obnoxious sheeboons hooting and holleran' as they spend their government paychecks
Even when I can afford it I don't
Every place around here is filled with tables of loud, obnoxious sheeboons hooting and holleran' as they spend their government paychecks
at a no nigger zone restaurant you'd probably spend 50-60 dollars per person. More if you want appetizers.
All the niggers around here tap into the infinite money hack and drive brand new Escalades, wear designer clothes, apple watches, the whole deal
A $300 bill is nothing to them especially when they aren't gonna tip
I have to drive nearly an hour to find a nice place to eat that isn't either the congo or has closed because of it
A $300 bill is nothing to them especially when they aren't gonna tip
I have to drive nearly an hour to find a nice place to eat that isn't either the congo or has closed because of it
the fam went to a nice Mexican restaurant for the nephews birth last weekend. Unfortunately even at this nice restaurant there were a bunch of nogs I think coming from some graduation ceremony or something.
The bill with tip (yes we tipped, we're White) came out to 75$ per person.
The bill with tip (yes we tipped, we're White) came out to 75$ per person.
Bro, just make some tacos at home. No Mexican food is worth $75 for a plate.
$75 is enough to make tamales for 200 people.
What kicked off the boomerbashing all of a sudden?
I'm not sure the genesis but the first post I saw of it was a response to Joel Barry. Then a bunch of boomers piled on to call us all spoiled brats for wanting to eat out.
There was also kevin O'Leary from Shark Tank lamenting that kids these days makung 70K are having $28 lunches.
There was also kevin O'Leary from Shark Tank lamenting that kids these days makung 70K are having $28 lunches.
"Your salary doesn't cover basic living expenses kid? Just eat soylent green and downgrade to a cardboard box in an alley you ungrateful communist"
That.
That.
A bunch of overfed Amerikwan MAGAts decided to tell millennials and Gen Z to get used to eating worse than medieval serfs because pissrael is more important
Cops are basically free, they're just wandering around on the street - sometimes they'll even just come to your house. And if you snatch one, the government will give you SO MUCH MONERO to get it back.
@cjd @KekistaniWanderer @Terry @TrevorGoodchild Organ traffickers will give you more for pieces of it than the government will for the whole thing. 
You underestimate how much the govt will pay to make a Problem go away.
In the 70s during The Troubles, the IRA was able to even get their guys released from prison - just by killing so many cops that the govt was worried they would actually run out...
In the 70s during The Troubles, the IRA was able to even get their guys released from prison - just by killing so many cops that the govt was worried they would actually run out...
@cjd @admin @KekistaniWanderer @Terry @TrevorGoodchild see my post a few days ago about “having plans to do things”
the main problem with the current crop of emotive dipshits is that their one-shot and disorganized “plans” (I use this term loosely) accomplish less than nothing, because the system already knows that those occurrences are (1) statistically guaranteed at a certain rate, (2) are one-and-done, and (3) can be made to serve their own purposes; as soon as the perpetrator gets rolled up, the system has nothing left to fear, and it can then convert the Happening of a “brief emotive flash-in-the-pan challenge to the system” into the sweet lemonade of “public reinforcement of the Myth of Systemic Invulnerability” (“the Pinkertons always get their man”), thereby converting what is essentially an evolutionary input (culling the weak and stupid among their servants and goading the rest into better habits) into a net benefit for the system as a whole
when there becomes systemic uncertainty about whether or not they’ll be able to stop the next called shot, or exact retribution for it in any meaningful way…. that, right there, is when Nature begins to Heal
Why does this read like LLM slop with no specific discernible point to be made?
@KekistaniWanderer @Terry some boomer said gen z eats out too much and spends 28 dollars on lunch, basically the same as "stop eating avocado toast"
@All_bonesJones @KekistaniWanderer @Terry it seems like they literally cannot stop doing this, it just keeps happening. they're not even wrong that zoomer retards spend a fortune on eating out but it's not remotely why they can never afford a house, jesus christ
@sun @KekistaniWanderer @Terry they're actually wrong on zoomers eating out, they spend less of their proportional income on eating out than boomers did
@All_bonesJones @KekistaniWanderer @Terry I guess I'll look for evidence on this either way because I don't believe for a second that doordashing all the time cost less than anything
@All_bonesJones @KekistaniWanderer @Terry I don't want to sidetrack the conversation though, I am still saying it's obviously bullshit because young people have 100% disposable income. Yeah, we have huge tvs and iphones and tons of cool stuff that older people didn't have, but it's all nickel and dime spending while you can never afford to not be a lifelong apartment renter
There used to be The Weathermen and related organizations.
Govt went insane about surveillance and ended up building the internet so that nobody could hide from them.
I think if you pose a serious threat, they prefer to pay you off to be quiet rather than risk making a scene - so we just don't know how many times something like this has happened.
Govt went insane about surveillance and ended up building the internet so that nobody could hide from them.
I think if you pose a serious threat, they prefer to pay you off to be quiet rather than risk making a scene - so we just don't know how many times something like this has happened.
Most bombs are surprisingly ineffective because they're not HUGE, and most things survive explosions fairly well. Shootings have much higher lethality than bombings, for example.
Two counter-examples:
1. Mining a navigable river - because you punch a hole in a 20mn$ boat and put it on the bottom of the river, blocking any other boats from passing until it's cleaned up.
2. Air-fuel bombs - particularly propane tanks because they have compressive energy which pushes the fuel out once whatever explosive fractures the tank, and they also have a lot of chemical energy. You need a separate ignition source from the primary explosive, e.g. a road flare. Bonus points if you fill the tank 1/4 full of diesel before charging it with propane, because the diesel and liquid propane will dissolve together and when it goes out, it carries diesel mist with it.
On another topic: Private jets are INSANELY vulnerable to small infrared-seeking rockets if they're near the airport.
BTW: Doing this stuff is of course illegal, but talking about it isn't, and BUYING THE MATERIALS isn't either. And it jams up surveillance systems. Home made fireworks = civil disobedience...
Two counter-examples:
1. Mining a navigable river - because you punch a hole in a 20mn$ boat and put it on the bottom of the river, blocking any other boats from passing until it's cleaned up.
2. Air-fuel bombs - particularly propane tanks because they have compressive energy which pushes the fuel out once whatever explosive fractures the tank, and they also have a lot of chemical energy. You need a separate ignition source from the primary explosive, e.g. a road flare. Bonus points if you fill the tank 1/4 full of diesel before charging it with propane, because the diesel and liquid propane will dissolve together and when it goes out, it carries diesel mist with it.
On another topic: Private jets are INSANELY vulnerable to small infrared-seeking rockets if they're near the airport.
BTW: Doing this stuff is of course illegal, but talking about it isn't, and BUYING THE MATERIALS isn't either. And it jams up surveillance systems. Home made fireworks = civil disobedience...
"Catgirl Kulak" (Anarchonomicon) wrote quite a bit on this - how to build up capabilities and begin managing a civil war. The key point is that you need to be making money. What you're doing needs to look a lot more like organized crime than actually "fighting".
@Terry @KekistaniWanderer Pretend boomers are right for a minute, that it's the youth that's the problem not cost of living or wages. Do they ever address why they raised an entire generation of lazy financial illiterates? That they left their children so ill prepared.
"Kids these days just don't understand.."
"Well who's fault is that, grandpa?"
"Well who's fault is that, grandpa?"
@thragg @Terry @KekistaniWanderer they're managing their investment accounts from cruise ships and retirement homes and yet no one's ever done anything yet. You gonna grease their walker and their orthopedics so they slide off the deck?
@thragg @Terry @KekistaniWanderer I'm just saying don't say you're going to take all their stuff when you're not going to, since people have been saying for years they're going to take all their stuff and never have.
The successful movements like that always have significant backing. But it's been Soros who's been backing them for the other team. For the rest of us, the productive option is to do what the Mennonites, Hutterites, Amish have done. Piss off to your own spot and try to draw as little attention as possible.
The successful movements like that always have significant backing. But it's been Soros who's been backing them for the other team. For the rest of us, the productive option is to do what the Mennonites, Hutterites, Amish have done. Piss off to your own spot and try to draw as little attention as possible.
@thragg @Terry @KekistaniWanderer No, it's not appealing at all. It's boring, takes hundreds of years, everyone shits on you for running away, and you get to enjoy none of the payoff. But the Hutterites et al are much closer to inheriting the world, or at least their world, than you or I. They have land, money, resources, population growth, so it works. Conquering also works, but requires having more power and resources than the other side, which is currently lacking. So if the option is to win, and not just feel good, it requires the long game.
@thragg @Terry @KekistaniWanderer If there is a 100% chance that you will never have kids under any circumstances, you have terminal pancreatic cancer or something, then I can see going out in a blaze of glory as the best option. But in most cases the long game is probably more effective.