instead of age verification just require isps to use a dns whitelist that the owner can control. then you can effectively parent your kids' access.
Post
Remote status
Replies
18put the whitelist per-device if youre concerned about ISP privacy
these would have to be prebuilt and work like Cisco Umbrella's categorization system
-Outlaw ownership of smartphones (dumb phones accepted) and tablet for kids, with outright confiscation if a kid is found with one
-Advocate for a return to the living room/kitchen computer, which will also lead the kids to not be complete computer retards because of the idiot squares made for idiots
"how are we supposed to groom children if parents can monitor them !?"
>Most ISP have custom router shit nowadays
Reminds me that my ISP labeled the site for youtube revanced as dangerous malware and refuses to respond to requests for any of the archive.* domains.
@sun this would be perfect for the gateway? set up what the different devices can visit. mobile use goes via a vpn through the home gateway.
Isn't this pretty much what those e.g., netnanny products do?
@sun it doesn't have anything to do with children.
i spent a long time this morning reading about how the U.S. Government has no way to track all of its citizens because SSN aren't identifiers (except when they are), and we have no federal ID.
This doesn't have anything to do with children and everything to do with lobbyists for techbro companies to spy on us even harder.
Fucking age attestation. the dumbest, thinnest veneer over surveillance.
How would that work with DoH, VPNs, Tor, the ability to add custom DNS providers (eg. OpenNIC), or even just add an ip + hostname in /etc/hosts, etc? Not that age verification is technically any better, but the DNS approach seems too easy to circumvent, not to mention being built-in to most modern browsers already via DoH. Guaranteed at least one kid will figure that out and tell all their friends how to do it.