Egregoros

@Paultron @NitroDubs @Terry I think moldbug is a jew first, a democracy hater second, and a tech worshipper third and only because the "new feudal lords" he sucks up to are all involved in surveillance tech

@WandererUber @Paultron @NitroDubs @Terry I think he is a child of State Department employees first - which is critical here.

But also I think the point he is trying to make is not so much that flock cameras are great, but it's already a slave labor hellscape ( thus fighting flock isn't worth it - in his opinion )

@sickburnbro @Paultron @NitroDubs @Terry he did not say this at all. he explicitly said that it's harmful to destroy them:
>make everyone less safe
so he is not doing a "focus on what matters" concern troll.
He is explicitly doing the "giving up your civil liberties will keep you safe" concern troll.

@WandererUber @Paultron @NitroDubs @Terry no, I think he's saying you have no civil liberties, so why destroy something that can be used for safety to *pretend* you have them

@sickburnbro @Paultron @NitroDubs @Terry He is explicitly saying that destroying them makes everyone less safe.
And even if he wasn't saying this, but your steelman of him, that's also really retarded because you DO have the civil liberty of getting in your car and driving around without the government knowing where you are at all times, when there are no flock cameras.

Curtis Yarvin would have a point if the cameras weren’t being used to suppress opposition to White genocide

@s2208 @WandererUber @NitroDubs @Terry @sickburnbro @Paultron Absolutely no cameras would benefit whites in the west immensely.

@Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @s2208 @WandererUber @NitroDubs @Terry @Paultron I think police bodycams have been beneficial

Disagree. They give us humorous vignettes but nothing has actually changed. If a police needs to do police work, he just turns the camera off.

@s2208 @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @NitroDubs @Terry @WandererUber @Paultron don't vaguepoast - you mean "if a policeman is going to do a crime, he turns the camera off" - and sure that makes sense, but that also means that not having the camera on is an indication of guilt.

I apologize for not being clear enough.

Cops do two things: hurt people and process criminals.

Neither of these need a camera