Timeline
Post
Remote status
Context
37
Lack of belief is agnosticism, not atheism.
Agnosticism is a lack of certainty, atheism is a lack of belief.
I don’t see how “atheism” is “lack of belief“ - as the word clearly means “not-God-ism”.
Most atheists actually believe in God; they just hate him. They never rail against Allah, Buddha, Lord Ganesh, etc... but they've got plenty of venom for Yahweh & Jesus Christ.
I think "American Christianity" has had a lot to do with that problem.
While I’m no Protestant, the general “tone and timbre” of American Christianity, while starkly divided, was actually doing pretty darn bangin at ordering societies up until the 20th Century
It's fundamentalism. There was at least some understanding that religion and science could reasonably coexist with accomodation, and then the Red Scare happened, the Dulles brothers got the bright idea to weaponize religion, and we've been in backslide ever since.
People don't want to listen to it man.
Even when explaining the Jews - the Jews WROTE THE OLD TESTAMENT.
Do you not think it's reasonable to ask where they got this information and how they decided upon it?
But they never look into how the Jews do things. And consider it all "divine" when it's not. It was a bunch of Jews sitting around arguing until they all decided someone had won the argument. The entire jewish religion starts out with Abraham arguing with god and "winning the argument".
This is the basis for their whole religion - this is your old testament. It has nothing to do with divine beings from the sky.
Even when explaining the Jews - the Jews WROTE THE OLD TESTAMENT.
Do you not think it's reasonable to ask where they got this information and how they decided upon it?
But they never look into how the Jews do things. And consider it all "divine" when it's not. It was a bunch of Jews sitting around arguing until they all decided someone had won the argument. The entire jewish religion starts out with Abraham arguing with god and "winning the argument".
This is the basis for their whole religion - this is your old testament. It has nothing to do with divine beings from the sky.
Even if it were true that the OT were ahistorical (a claim I highly doubt), it misses the point entirely.
The OT was written centuries before the Incarnation of Christ, and was positively stuffed with Messianic Prophecy that wasn’t fulfilled until hundreds of years after all the authors had died. No merely-human agency at any level could possibly pull that off. That’s its actual significance
Of course it can be pulled off.
That's like saying "That last domino can't possible fall just because someone pushes over the first domino."
That's like saying "That last domino can't possible fall just because someone pushes over the first domino."
That’s not at all what it’s like; nobody human could possibly have steered events like the God-Man being born in a specific town, to a specific virgin. One doesn’t get to decide things like that about their own birth.
Yeah, they did, because these are narratives being presented within the context of things the narrators could not have witnessed.
Yeah I don’t know what to tell you. Shepherds and peasants and fishermen don’t really have a lot of ability to steer the sorts of narratives that rulers pay to have written down
That would presuppose the lack of a pre-existing oral tradition, which given that the apostles are mostly working-class illiterates, would dismantle the concept of apostolic tradition. I'll trust that's not what you meant to do, because that would be blasphemy to Orthodoxy.
Pretty sure we’re talking past each other; I’m referring to OT Messianic Prophecy
Which came from a bunch of Kabbalah Jews - which 'word for word' come out of the Torah.
So you might want to get interested in how they decided what was in the Torah, and what they mean by "God"
So you might want to get interested in how they decided what was in the Torah, and what they mean by "God"
Kabbalah is younger than islam, but close.
No, it's been around for a longass time.
It got moved across most of asia for thousands of years.
That anthropologist guy was constantly going on about it appearing in pre-history.
It got moved across most of asia for thousands of years.
That anthropologist guy was constantly going on about it appearing in pre-history.
No. One jew who was part of the muslim spanish ruling class "discovered ancient text" as soon as Spanish started kicking out jews with the muslims.
Yeah and the oral traditions were from 4000+ years ago according to the Jews.
The Hindu religion alone is 5000 years old dude. They simply have different names for the same thing.
The Hindu religion alone is 5000 years old dude. They simply have different names for the same thing.
I believe that there are ancient shared memories across all civilizations. I just don't think that means what you do. And Kabballah was invented, or possibly whispered in an ear in Spain centuries later.
I'm not talking about shared memory.
This system along with the symbols and chakras and sex magic, are all contained in religions from 5000 years onwards.
This system along with the symbols and chakras and sex magic, are all contained in religions from 5000 years onwards.
The Book of Enoch talks at length about how the Angels, who fell out of sheer lust for human women, corrupted mankind via teaching us "forbidden knowledge," a.k.a. magic, which goes a long way towards explaining why that book eventually became so demonized.
Considering that Eve is thrice cursed and thus more evil than Lillith, I can imagine why fallen angels would lust for them.
Imagine it from their (human women) perspective though. Women have always been fascinated by bad boys, and fallen angels are the ultimate bad boys, and they were also wiser and more beautiful than human men. No way that they could have resisted that.
Meanwhile, this handsome, solid, 6'4" Czech fighter just passed his genes through this post-wall, round, brown clown 😩 Fuggin bleachers... better work!
If only I were any good at martial arts.
Why do you want to be good at martial arts? To win yourself a frumpy turd lady?? Lol, jk...
So you can have pics like this & most women with a pulse fantasize about cutting your hair
So you can have pics like this & most women with a pulse fantasize about cutting your hair
I'm more about personality. Besides, post-fight sex is the best (and I say that as someone who lost after failing to make weight.)
Well, if you're a good specimen like him, puh-lease care about more than "personality." Smdh. Lol
Women who care exclusively about their looks and fail to cultivate a garden of the mind are boring, and I've already had enough booty calls to last a lifetime.
Oh, I get that, too. Bigly. But ain't no 9 dudes needing to settle for a 4-5 in this climate. Pffft.
Liar, liar, pants on fire.
No one believes you bro.
Men are ironically kinder rating us than we are you, though (possibly other women, too), so who knows what he means 🤷♀️ lol
Replies
7
Not really. We're kinder when you can hear it. We're kinder when other guys are around because most men will fuck anything over a hard 3 when they're going through a dry spell so we up the number as to confuse the other guys and soften the blow of "haha you'll fuck her??? She's barely a 3". See?
I thought it was the questionnaires of men rating womens' pics vs women rating mens' where men tended to be kinder overall? 🤔 Women don't do well with just a 2D pic of most men, though (most men are also bad at selfies, which is fair & good probably even, but hard in modern times maybe).
Regardless, I've always thought both genders will compromise a couple points for other great qualities. But I still hate seeing overly off couples looks-wise. If that makes me shallow... yep. Lol
Regardless, I've always thought both genders will compromise a couple points for other great qualities. But I still hate seeing overly off couples looks-wise. If that makes me shallow... yep. Lol
Men's rating system. Notice bottom center
From my brothers & husband... can confirm. Lol
...idk, though, I been seeing some "mids" I'd call at least a 7-7.5.
@GoyGirl @zeke @shortstories @Dagnar @PodunkPotato @Sovereign @GoonPatrol @James_Dixon @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @KingOfWhiteAmerica @multiversal_gangstalker @thatfightnerd @thefinn I think most guys want something they can relate to and kinda go "ok she's cute". guys also like different things. Like some dudes will be like "i want a big ass" or like "I like that she can open beers with her teeth"
That is 100% true, but most women always seem to bitch like our standards are too high. Most guys - some Chads even - will marry a 6 out of 10 who knows how to doll up nice if she's also smart and sweet. We're pretty easy.
Meanwhile modern Western female 5's are swiping left on anybody who falls short of James Bond.
Meanwhile modern Western female 5's are swiping left on anybody who falls short of James Bond.