RT: https://pkteerium.xyz/objects/574f6bb4-bdd0-4a14-935d-b4b8534adf23
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Context
5
I was sure this was gonna catch some hate. It's 2026 and the least enthusiastic response is a slow nod.
RT: https://pkteerium.xyz/objects/574f6bb4-bdd0-4a14-935d-b4b8534adf23
RT: https://pkteerium.xyz/objects/574f6bb4-bdd0-4a14-935d-b4b8534adf23
@cjd just >arresting the judges would go a long way to stop this kinda of thing, since those are the ones that allow these filthy animals to commit these atrocities again and again
Unfortunately that doesn't really work - they'll surly try but it's a dead end. You can't arrest a judge for judging, judging is their job.
The judges are elected officials, and they're just doing exactly what they were elected to do. If they start enforcing laws against blacks they lose the black vote and then they lose the election.
However, where it all falls down is when you ask "who is going to risk their life to defend such a system?" and the answer is Daniel Montano - but I'm not convinced that enough Daniel Montanos exist for it to be sustainable. And certainly a lot of them are about to get wiped out in Iran.
The judges are elected officials, and they're just doing exactly what they were elected to do. If they start enforcing laws against blacks they lose the black vote and then they lose the election.
However, where it all falls down is when you ask "who is going to risk their life to defend such a system?" and the answer is Daniel Montano - but I'm not convinced that enough Daniel Montanos exist for it to be sustainable. And certainly a lot of them are about to get wiped out in Iran.
>You can't arrest a judge for judging
seems to have worked fine for bukele
seems to have worked fine for bukele
You're right, it'll work if the voting majority is on your side.
Replies
6
Genocide is difficult, risky, and unnecessary, just look at how much flack Israel has caught by wiping the Palestinians.
All you need to do is re-define who votes -> And a government that is about to be conquered will rationally give EVERYTHING to those best able and willing to defend it, including exclusive voting rights.
"Those best willing to defend it" means men, because women who can fight a war are too rare to matter. And it means mono-ethnic because multi-ethnic armies are a catastrophe. So you just have to decide which ethnicity is going to defend you. You can forget about minorities because there's not enough of them (by definition), and you can forget about ethnicities which are not known for fighting ability. So by simple process of deduction you end up with "governments survive only by White men's willingness to defend them".
If we declare that our price is that we must have exclusive voting rights, then we will.
All you need to do is re-define who votes -> And a government that is about to be conquered will rationally give EVERYTHING to those best able and willing to defend it, including exclusive voting rights.
"Those best willing to defend it" means men, because women who can fight a war are too rare to matter. And it means mono-ethnic because multi-ethnic armies are a catastrophe. So you just have to decide which ethnicity is going to defend you. You can forget about minorities because there's not enough of them (by definition), and you can forget about ethnicities which are not known for fighting ability. So by simple process of deduction you end up with "governments survive only by White men's willingness to defend them".
If we declare that our price is that we must have exclusive voting rights, then we will.
@cjd @smugumin @wizardmanperson
>Genocide is difficult, risky, and unnecessary
Cool it with the antisemitism
>Genocide is difficult, risky, and unnecessary
Cool it with the antisemitism
I'm not antisemitic, some of my best friends are Palestinians 😏
This BTW is why I'm interested in learning more about the Arian Brotherhood. Here you have a mono-ethnic group which is ruled by vote of its fighting men. That's a Minimum Viable Country right there...
@cjd @smugumin @wizardmanperson >because women who can fight a war are too rare to matter
it's really over, isn't it?
it's really over, isn't it?
You mean for women's lib?