RT: https://cawfee.club/objects/991c3ad1-b18d-42f8-a4ba-45e0a39df4e5
Post
Remote status
Context
19RT: https://cawfee.club/objects/991c3ad1-b18d-42f8-a4ba-45e0a39df4e5
The two things I like the least about it are apt (but we knew that was gonna happen), and flatpak.
Anyway, I'm not challenging your experience. Linux desktop distros all suck. I've never found a single one that wasn't utter dog shit to use, with "was he drunk" level bugs everywhere you look...
Is it a package manager for chrooted packages like nix? Because someone trying to do that for real would be pretty neat.
Oh well...
My favorite linux is still OpenWrt.
IDK it's just frustrating software advances at the speed of a snail.
Right but then the question is why can't you flatpak the entire distro?
Okay, but can you flatpak like libc and the kernel, and then eliminate apt entirely ?
It's based on the assumption that the underlying system is totally fucked - which sadly is the only safe assumption you can make.
But it only makes a blast shield to protect one desktop app from a fucked system, it doesn't do anything to unfuck the system itself.
Yeah, I'm just gonna sit around and be a bitter old man and say it's a tragedy that the chroot idea from nix is not universal.
Replies
46What apple does - for better or worse - is they ship a standard base system, and then you can install whatever using homebrew and it mostly Just Works (because the base system is always exactly the same for everyone). Also their code (what I've seen of it) is generally not dog shit terrible.
I don't use any phone to speak of - just once in a while to take a picture or get a text authentication thing. Devil's tablet.
BTW, verify that box you're using, I got one and it was garbage. If you put a YT song on and put it in the box, it should lose signal and the song should stop...
I hear flatpaks are trash
And flatass.
And flatabs
So you hate them?
my understanding is flat packs containerize programs for linux so thatt they don't break as soon as a lib on oyur pc updates linux actually has a real bad time with backwards compatibility for native programs becuase lib updates break shit all the time it's actually worse than windows if a program isn't updated regularly
> So we'll put a 20 foot wall around our program and include an entire mini distro along with it
> Because getting distro developers to stop being knuckle-dragging monkeys is unrealistic...
:|
Windows comes with an extraordinarily rich standard library though so in general, you don't need all that much in your exe file.
Yeah, I wanna hate cloood shit like OnShape, but I remember what horrors were packaged inside of AutoCad so ... yeah...
I always want to tell you to just install a OS that will run software when you click on it, and then I remember you live in a Foucaultian panoptical open air death camp for white people masquerading as a central European country
mine does that *shrug*
I was just thinking apple was looking pretty good
It's good enough for me. But I want to never ever ever have to fiddle fuck around with my desktop. Get it setup and then forget it exists for ... years.
Do you run dist-upgrades ever?
When a machine ages out, I spin up a new one, transfer the projects, and then kill it.
But nonetheless, dist-upgrade has always been - for me - a short road to "2 versions of libc, unknown weird dependency loop fuckery, dead machine"
And yeah, actual *development* machines for me are VMs which I'm okay to kill off when I'm done with them...
So are you saying that developer-minded people are best suited for Mac ? Because mostly I've heard that it's the opposite...
I hate computers
I am a self-confessed tech tard. Always have been. God bless those of you "out in the great beyond..."
I don't even know what Mac is really doing, except that creating a disk image just to hold an app is goofy AF
Right I know that, but are they just shipping every version of every system dynamic lib forever just in case someone needs an old one? Or do they upgrade them very carefully?