π²
kikes stole your gspot and told you itβs in your butt
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Replies
28
Like being born and Pinhead from Hellraiser is the delivery doctor.
Missing my gspot
still love sex...wait
you mean it would have been even BETTER?!?
FUCK YOU, JEWS
still love sex...wait
you mean it would have been even BETTER?!?
FUCK YOU, JEWS
Haha clipped dick goy
@suquili I love getting licks there.
Funny enough I remember learning this on some shitty episode of Oprah featuring Dr. Oz that my mom was watching lol.
yeah ikr
tbh the area they're referring to still feels the best, but i'm not surprised the senses have been dulled
tbh the area they're referring to still feels the best, but i'm not surprised the senses have been dulled
"g-spot" implies male orgasm is as powerful as female, it's not.
However, the article saying "may be damaged" is a severe understatement. This "frenular delta" (Y-shape) they're referring to actually extends all the way around, forming a loop under the skin. It is the most arousing place to touch, and they almost always cut it off.
However, the article saying "may be damaged" is a severe understatement. This "frenular delta" (Y-shape) they're referring to actually extends all the way around, forming a loop under the skin. It is the most arousing place to touch, and they almost always cut it off.
Oh, one last point: It's very unclear whether being cut as an infant actually reduces sensation. Nervous systems adapt to what they have, if they weren't then you'd either be numb or in constant pain. Nobody really knows the answer to this question, but it's highly likely that "an orgasm is an orgasm".
The BIGGEST argument against circumcision is that it has something like a 1-2% complication rate, which is insane compared to the numbers that doctors consider "elevated risk" in other domains - and the "benefits" are all junk science.
The BIGGEST argument against circumcision is that it has something like a 1-2% complication rate, which is insane compared to the numbers that doctors consider "elevated risk" in other domains - and the "benefits" are all junk science.
Pedo rabbi goblins giving newborns STDs is a bigger problem, Shlomo.
Oh absolutely. But most of the time it's done in hospitals and they don't do that weird shit. So biggest single argument why it should not be done is because "doctor slipped with the knife" is startlingly common - and there's no medical benefit.
the pilpul is strong with this one
@suquili honestly this is a perfect way to determine if someone is Jewish or not, " show us your dick, or get shot with this .45" π
Not sure what you're getting at w/ the pilpul thing, but FTR I think circumcision is a bad idea. I also think the people who are against it are miserably bad at convincing anyone of anything. If you think convincing people is pilpul and that's bad, IDK what to say b/c convincing people is how every decision on the planet gets made.
I don't care what you think. Piss off back to wherever the fuck you came from.
@stoner713 @cjd @Handy @suquili
He's not defending circumcision. He's pointing out why it's bad and has been debunked for some decades now. Here's a short list of circumcision problems with links to other research that shows baby dick cutting is bad and medically backwards.
https://cirp.org/library/complications/
He's not defending circumcision. He's pointing out why it's bad and has been debunked for some decades now. Here's a short list of circumcision problems with links to other research that shows baby dick cutting is bad and medically backwards.
https://cirp.org/library/complications/
Not just that, there is actually a very important reason why I'm saying medical complications are the best argument.
For YEARS, anti-circ guys have been going around saying "Every cut man is a victim, all wounded, damaged, and will never experience full sexuality".
Well, some expecting mother hears this, asks her husband "hey, are you a victim?" He says "No." and the argument dies right then and there.
For YEARS, anti-circ guys have been going around saying "Every cut man is a victim, all wounded, damaged, and will never experience full sexuality".
Well, some expecting mother hears this, asks her husband "hey, are you a victim?" He says "No." and the argument dies right then and there.
@cjd @Handy @stoner713 @suquili
The victim angle is the wrong tack.
Just say what everyone is thinking "mutilating baby dicks is sick and amoral"
The victim angle is the wrong tack.
Just say what everyone is thinking "mutilating baby dicks is sick and amoral"
> Yeah, that thing is pleasurable
> And no, it's not "potentially damaged", they cut it off
> But, your dick is probably fine bro
Okay yea that was more harsh than intended...
But weirdly enough that is kind of the truth, even men circumcised in adulthood are split on whether they're happy with it or not. If it was THE NERVE, then everyone would be say it was the worst decision of their lives.
I still think it's a bad idea, particularly because of what happens if it goes wrong. But there's no evidence that it's the kind of "pleasure castration" that a lot of people imagine it is.
> And no, it's not "potentially damaged", they cut it off
> But, your dick is probably fine bro
Okay yea that was more harsh than intended...
But weirdly enough that is kind of the truth, even men circumcised in adulthood are split on whether they're happy with it or not. If it was THE NERVE, then everyone would be say it was the worst decision of their lives.
I still think it's a bad idea, particularly because of what happens if it goes wrong. But there's no evidence that it's the kind of "pleasure castration" that a lot of people imagine it is.
I think if no one was practicing jewish 'hygeine' rituals, the West would be a better place.
Like I am not even kidding this argument of "oh we can't even tell."
No, stop. Think again of what you are trying to rationalize. I will never let anyone cut any son I father.
Like I am not even kidding this argument of "oh we can't even tell."
No, stop. Think again of what you are trying to rationalize. I will never let anyone cut any son I father.
>>But there's no evidence that it's the kind of "pleasure castration"
What I can give you is anecdotal evidence, I know a faggot (a real one) who got himself circumcised (a faggot fetish thing) induced by advise from other faggots. He says his dick lost a lot of sensitivity and now has all sort of irritations. π€·ββοΈ
Faggots.
What I can give you is anecdotal evidence, I know a faggot (a real one) who got himself circumcised (a faggot fetish thing) induced by advise from other faggots. He says his dick lost a lot of sensitivity and now has all sort of irritations. π€·ββοΈ
Faggots.
> a better place
Quite possibly so. Between Americans, Jews, and Muslims, there's a notable correlation with violent populations. Pic Rel.
> I will never let anyone cut any son I father
Ya, I'm not Jewish, not Muslim and I live in France, so we don't do that in our family either.
Quite possibly so. Between Americans, Jews, and Muslims, there's a notable correlation with violent populations. Pic Rel.
> I will never let anyone cut any son I father
Ya, I'm not Jewish, not Muslim and I live in France, so we don't do that in our family either.
There was some Canadian who did it and it was so bad he committed suicide over it. So outcomes are extraordinarily variable and if you're an adult, I don't recommended it unless you NEED it (super rare, even most medical things can be handled less invasively)
Jews are sterilizing us.
My (poorly argued) point from this thread is:
1. It's bad and there's no justification for it
2. But it doesn't mean your dick is ruined
3. UNLESS there's a complication, which is startlingly common
4. Anti-circ people make all cut men out to be victims - which is a losing argument b/c lots of them are perfectly happy how they are
5. Arguing against circumcision is best done by bringing up the complication risk, because it doesn't challenge anyone's lived experience and the risk is ridiculously high given the (nonexistent) benefits.
1. It's bad and there's no justification for it
2. But it doesn't mean your dick is ruined
3. UNLESS there's a complication, which is startlingly common
4. Anti-circ people make all cut men out to be victims - which is a losing argument b/c lots of them are perfectly happy how they are
5. Arguing against circumcision is best done by bringing up the complication risk, because it doesn't challenge anyone's lived experience and the risk is ridiculously high given the (nonexistent) benefits.