Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Context

3
"g-spot" implies male orgasm is as powerful as female, it's not.

However, the article saying "may be damaged" is a severe understatement. This "frenular delta" (Y-shape) they're referring to actually extends all the way around, forming a loop under the skin. It is the most arousing place to touch, and they almost always cut it off.
Oh, one last point: It's very unclear whether being cut as an infant actually reduces sensation. Nervous systems adapt to what they have, if they weren't then you'd either be numb or in constant pain. Nobody really knows the answer to this question, but it's highly likely that "an orgasm is an orgasm".

The BIGGEST argument against circumcision is that it has something like a 1-2% complication rate, which is insane compared to the numbers that doctors consider "elevated risk" in other domains - and the "benefits" are all junk science.

Replies

14

Oh absolutely. But most of the time it's done in hospitals and they don't do that weird shit. So biggest single argument why it should not be done is because "doctor slipped with the knife" is startlingly common - and there's no medical benefit.

Not sure what you're getting at w/ the pilpul thing, but FTR I think circumcision is a bad idea. I also think the people who are against it are miserably bad at convincing anyone of anything. If you think convincing people is pilpul and that's bad, IDK what to say b/c convincing people is how every decision on the planet gets made.

Not just that, there is actually a very important reason why I'm saying medical complications are the best argument.

For YEARS, anti-circ guys have been going around saying "Every cut man is a victim, all wounded, damaged, and will never experience full sexuality".

Well, some expecting mother hears this, asks her husband "hey, are you a victim?" He says "No." and the argument dies right then and there.
> Yeah, that thing is pleasurable
> And no, it's not "potentially damaged", they cut it off
> But, your dick is probably fine bro

Okay yea that was more harsh than intended...

But weirdly enough that is kind of the truth, even men circumcised in adulthood are split on whether they're happy with it or not. If it was THE NERVE, then everyone would be say it was the worst decision of their lives.

I still think it's a bad idea, particularly because of what happens if it goes wrong. But there's no evidence that it's the kind of "pleasure castration" that a lot of people imagine it is.
> a better place

Quite possibly so. Between Americans, Jews, and Muslims, there's a notable correlation with violent populations. Pic Rel.

> I will never let anyone cut any son I father

Ya, I'm not Jewish, not Muslim and I live in France, so we don't do that in our family either.
>>But there's no evidence that it's the kind of "pleasure castration"

What I can give you is anecdotal evidence, I know a faggot (a real one) who got himself circumcised (a faggot fetish thing) induced by advise from other faggots. He says his dick lost a lot of sensitivity and now has all sort of irritations. πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

Faggots.

There was some Canadian who did it and it was so bad he committed suicide over it. So outcomes are extraordinarily variable and if you're an adult, I don't recommended it unless you NEED it (super rare, even most medical things can be handled less invasively)