Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

I have a coherent and internally-consistent theory of what has happened to us, from which I’ll pull a few salient bullet points.

•women vote to redistribute male production away from men and toward themselves. This is both direct, in terms of welfare and social spending, and opportunities, such as equal opportunity laws. With those opportunities, they enter the workforce and displace men directly. By taxing away these male products and socializing them, a woman’s need to choose one man falls precipitously.

Without the incentive to be manly, men won’t be.

•women vote to reduce the agency of men to act in male ways to affect the world. Mild corrective violence, and even hurty words, are outlawed. Only female ways of behavior are permitted. Men who act like women are more likely to get ahead. Men who act like men are shunned by this new supermajority of feminine culture.

•with the advent of no-fault divorce and strict DV laws interpreted liberally, a man cannot guarantee that committing to a woman will be fruitful, peaceful, or safe. Likewise, any divorce will likely result in the man getting divorce raped financially and socially.

•with the overwhelming wave of brown immigration, a huge boon to women as they are now subject to increased sexual selection, the men who are at the margins of this new regime find greater competition for resources and mates. Again, legislation favoring the savage hedges out the native man from even that which he would nominally be entitled to.

•at the same time, the dramatic increase in population coupled with the shrinking family size means a catastrophic increase in the demand for housing and transportation. Rents are too damn high.

•finally, the unlimited quantitative easing erodes the buying and saving power of those who are left.

At some point, being a hard man doing hard things is just masochism. Mise well work the bare minimum and drown in video games, sports book, marihuana and porn.

And I haven’t even cracked the precipitous decline in the value of the average woman.

Replies

34
I would suggest also the element of having a complex financial system, and in particular the central bank.

Before 1913, each bank issued its own money, and that worked as long as each bank had enough gold to back it up. If they ran out of gold then they were bankrupt and went out of business, so their printing was restrained.

After 1913, the central bank issued a common money and it was not backed by gold (caveats abound, but people in the US could not demand redemption for gold so it was essentially NOT backed).

Instead, the printing was restrained by Inflation Targets. If they printed too much money, prices would go up too much, so their printing was restrained.

But in this difference is the devil. Because once inflation targets became the goal, then the field of Economics was developed to study it, and people were hired to figure out how to reduce it.

> Convince people to stop eating butter and eat oil instead.

Maybe bad for their health, but oil is cheaper, and if people eat cheaper food then there's "less inflation", so the government can print more money.

Everybody loves printing money. When they print money, the stock market goes up, more business open and there's more jobs. People are happy and politicians get re-elected.

Then they go back to the economists again and say "how can we reduce inflation?"

> Encourage women to join the workforce. More workers will depress wages, which will make inflation less.

> But, without families the nation will slowly die!

> You asked, I answered. If you want to reduce inflation, encourage women to join the workforce.

And so it goes... The quest to reduce inflation eventually results in the destruction of every thing that is beautiful and worthwhile in this world.

> The middle class is buying too much stuff, it's driving up inflation. Make them poorer. Sell crack on the streets so that they don't have money to buy steak dinners, then the steak dinners will stay cheap because they won't be getting bought up.

> Import 100 million Indians who will work for one dollar per day because then wages will stop going up so much.

And so on until the nation eventually collapses. As did Rome, so does America.
US dollar before 1834 was defined by law as equivalent in silver content to the Spanish dollar coin.
“the money of account of the United States shall be expressed in dollars or units … of the value [mass or weight] of a Spanish milled dollar as the same is now current, and to contain three hundred and seventy-one grains and four sixteenth parts of a grain of pure … silver."
Gold coins were minted as a convenience, $100 in silver coin would weigh about 7 pounds. The ratio of gold per dollar was periodically adjusted by law to match the market price ratio.
1834, Congress passed the a new Coinage Act, which, contrary to the Constitution, defined the dollar as gold, and made both silver certificates and silver coin essentially fiat money.
Each bank did not "issue its own money." The US Treasury issued money. States could, under the Constitution, issue money, but such attempts were rightly viewed with deep suspicion and generally failed.
The 1913 Federal Reserve act deliberately removed the option for redemption because the intent was to print money so they could vig the gap between issuance and inflation.
The 1933 abrogation of the Coinage Act and seizure of gold returned silver as the Constitutional money standard
> issued by an enemy tribe, consumed by the desire to eliminate us

I don't wanna let Jews off the hook for their actual shenanigans, but I also want to push back against oversimplification because casting this as a pure race war is "too comfortable" and will lead to wrong conclusions.

This "consumed by the desire to eliminate us" is objectively true of some Jews - particularly some of the Epstein people. But it's also true of some people that are not considered Jews. It was the Bush family that dumped crack and heroin on America, and they must never be allowed to slither away from that.

What we know is that of the 11 guys at Jekyll Island, only one was known to be a Jew. You can of course hypothesize that The Rothschilds were behind everything and everyone - and people do, but the amount of logical leaps that you need to make in order to make this square are revealing of its nature as a psychological crutch.

And then you have countries like Poland, Romania, Iran and so on, which have essentially no Jews. But they still manage to come up with central banking. Conversely, you have Switzerland which is home to lots of Jews - but only abandoned the gold standard as recently as the 1970s. Finally you have Israel, which one would expect to have no internal tribal warfare, and yet it has a central bank.

So I think the correct framing is that Jews and immigrants ARE less likely to be loyal to their home country than legacy families. And some super-wealthy people ARE insanely psychopathic. But above all else, Weak Men Make Hard Times, and the blame for that cannot be scapegoated.
@s2208 @cjd
I think you will all be pleasantly surprised by the financial reset coming in the form of crypto currency. The distributed ledgers of crypto currency won’t allow for runaway inflation. It will probably be a little chaotic at first but as the petro dollar is replaced by cross border ledgers such as XRP and all real world assets become tokenized, it will become difficult for the George Soroses of the world to destabilize national currencies. Distributed ledgers won’t allow for manipulation.

As AI becomes adopted and robots take jobs, the job market will be decimated. Women and shitskins in the workforce will soon be in the same boat as the straight White man, jobless.

The future for us is not employment. The future is entrepreneurialship/gig/contract work. Having a job will be a thing of the past. Entrepreneurship is not something women or shitskins have the ability too do, so the sooner you can make the transition too sole proprietor or 1099 contractor the better off you’ll be.

At the turn of the 1900s, over 90% of Americans were small business owners (farmers). We will have no choice but too return too that lifestyle/small business economy. Luckily anybody can now build an awesome website using tools like GoDady too start your business.

Start looking 5 years into the future and picture working for yourself. Women and shitskins are not able too do this. It’s a White mans game and the jews are handing it too us on a silver platter if you can recognize it…
Are you familiar with the short video Rules for Rulers?

In it, the narrator lays out the game theoretical reason why benevolent dictatorships do not actually exist in the world.

In dictatorships, power is taken by force, and you must spend all of the public treasury buying the loyalty of those who project that force - or by replaced by coup.

In democracy, power is taken by votes, and you must spend all of the public treasury on buying them - or be replaced by election.

But in either case, those who will not allocate all of the treasure to buying support will find themselves replaced by those that will.

And when "all of the treasure" means all of the money that can be printed - it means EVERY country will print itself into a death spiral, without exception.

---

And this is what I mean when I say that scapegoating the Jews will take you to the wrong conclusion.

If you expel the Jews but keep the money printer - you will find yourself in the exact same position they're in. You can print and sell out the soul of your country, or you can refuse and be replaced.
There are a couple of things going on at the same time right now.

1. US Empire is collapsing - root cause of this is decentralization of narrative control (social media). A LOT of ink has been spilled on this topic, but to be super abbreviated:
* Before guns, power was based on army size - power centralized in kings.
* Guns made it so anyone could kill -> Great decentralization -> America, Freedom, ...
* Radio and TV caused a re-centralization based on narrative control -> 20th century, world wars, USSR, US Empire
* Internet makes it so anyone can *broadcast* -> Second Great Decentralization is upon us (🎉)

2. Internet makes it impossible to keep a secret anymore. This is SUCH A BIG DEAL that you could argue it that it constitutes The Judgement.

So basically, I'm more with Johnny (sans the XRP stuff). We're driving into an actual golden age, but we can only see what's in the rear view mirror.
I agree with your assessment. But there are other root causes.

1. The rulers have a fundamentally different vision for the world than the ruled. Theirs doesn’t include us.

2. They have imported enemy tribesman. These people can’t maintain civilization.
Yes, and also Women (I have academic sources to back this up), and the naturally corrosive effect of currency debasement (see: Ancient Rome).

I would kind of roll this up into "Imperial Lifespan" because all of these things have existed throughout history. The one that's really unique and interesting is the internet one.
The answer is to just intentionally accept a slightly dumber economy and establish that hard money is the rule.

That's what emperor Constantin did saving eastern Rome - he ceased debasement of the solidus.

There's a bunch of ways to do this, it's just about having the political will to draw a line in the sand and decree that beyond this line is the devil and nobody must ever cross it again (they will but it should buy a few centuries...)
Instinct aside, something we know for a fact is that we are programmed to die. Cells can only multiply a limited number of times - hence the fixation of "stem cells". BTW breaking this programming is what all of the "cure aging" people are trying to do, which is why it's not entirely insane as a goal.

But to your question, Dr. Dani Sulikowski suggested that perhaps it is exactly like that.
But it buys you another few centuries. Byzantium was a fabulous success.

That said, crypto may potentially put fiat money in its grave forever. Because it makes currencies something that anyone can create (in an afternoon even), so the future of money may well become a greasy pole that is impossible for any future fiat system to ever climb again.
The argument I use for lolberts is a little more complex:

1. How do you prevent someone from organizing a mafia and then demanding 30% of everyone's earnings?

(they start talking about private police, private courts, etc etc etc)

2. What if I told you we already live in Libertarian Utopia, it just happens there's a mafia running around taxing everyone (they call themselves the government, but any such mafia obviously would do this)
You're aware that most elites are absolute fucking nutballs and none of their "secret truths" should ever ever EVER be taken as fact.

Those idiots built CERN because they thought they could open a portal to hell and meet Lucifer.

They are good at exactly one thing, and that's insane levels of loyalty to each-other. Everything else they're fucking basket-cases.