Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Context

2
At first I thought how he sounds like an European caricature made by someone from USA, lecturing the yanks about basic things as if they're too stupid to figure it out + the actual cultural difference meaning neither side will ever understand why the other does it that way. Then I read the question he was answering. Must have been a liberal. I also assume it's not as bad as memes make it out to be.

Always been surprised by US media portraying the yanks as willing to move entire states as if it was nothing and starting out life from scratch.

Germanic work ethic or jewish writers projecting their rootless behaviour?
You have to realize that our various cultures (Europe and the Americas) have deeply rooted identities that, in the past century or so, have been corrupted by jews and turned against us. Independence, adventurousness, the desire and ability to tame our environments, these are all core to the American ethnogenisis. The problem is that there are no more frontiers to conquer and if there were any we would be denied the ability to conquer them, if not directly than through the process of holding the door open for browns to go ahead of us. So we're held to the standard of being as self-reliant as the most rugged of frontiersman while being forced to pay rent and taxes. They've made it illegal to exist outside of their system but impossible to advance within it.

Anyways, this is my thesis for why we need White gangs, bring back the age of the outlaw. We're the real counterculture because we want family, morality, and racial purity.

Replies

21

In the modern era with bush planes, solar / batteries / hydropower, starlink, portable saw mills, etc, all of those places still suck to colonize - but in the 1600s with sailing ships and .... that's it ... the continental US sucked to colonize. So I don't see how those territories are actually any worse...

Explorer peoples produce advanced civilizations because exploration is hard, and hard things create evolutionary pressure. The "curse" of Africa is that it's just so abundant that you don't really have to *do* anything, fruit grows on trees, you eat it...

Modern city life is pretty close to Africa, especially if you're on welfare and food stamps. You don't really need to "figure out how to survive".

Obvious strategy to exclude low-trust people is move somewhere where survival is not a given... Long post with thoughts on this topic here: https://pkteerium.xyz/@cjd/posts/B5quLquZV0WLkroUYC

Honestly if you wanted to squat Yukon or Northern territory, the chance Canada actually bothers you about it is pretty close to zero. And if they did, you could probably invoke some arcane migrant / squatter's right argument and tie it up in courts for a decade anyway.

Today we have:
* Solar which is insanely good - everybody loves to shit on solar but nobody does the math on how much power those panels generate.
* Really high density batteries
* Wood gas - which frankly should be more well developed
* Starlink internet available ~everywhere
* Obscenely good insulation
* Weather prediction and topographical maps of the entire earth
* Portable saw mills
* Fucking refrigeration
* Antibiotics

When Massachusetts was settled in the 1600s they didn't really have any of this stuff, and while it's not polar, Massachusetts does have real winter. So I can't believe that settling the north pole now is in any way more difficult than it was for the Massachusetts bay colony.
North:
Has water
Extreme cold in winter, summer not that cold
Stuff grows, animals exist, hunting & farming possible
Plenty of wood you can burn for energy

Desert:
No water (!!!)
Not super cold
Very little grows, few animals

North still wins because trucking in water is the depths of misery.