Egregoros

@WandererUber Unironically, very good Video. As a Left‑Winger, I will go through it from the other Side. However, I do agree with the Basic Premise: no, there is no strong Agreement—that is something People tell each other.
0:40–1:23: He is right. I am Anti‑War on Principle; Right‑Wingers aren't. I disagree with his Notion that all Left‑Wingers believe Nations should exist. Nation States, maybe, in such a Sense—but a Nation in the Sense of a united Ethnic Community, I support that.
1:50–2:01: 'White Supremacist, Crusader, Colonial Empire.' Pure Rhetoric.
2:08–2:30: That is pure Cope. Nobody—nobody—has been clean in the whole Epstein Shit till now, and several Right‑Wingers have defended him 'as a Joke.' 'Muslims'—specific Subgroup called Pakistanis. Epstein is worse than #MeToo by a Longshot, but neither Side can claim they handled it well.
Trans and Homosexuality Stuff: Yeah, still think that is gross.
3:50–4:18: Yes, that is a fundamental Difference between Wagies and non‑Wagies. But the Problem is, formerly, Society was actually transactional for being a Wagie—you got something out of it. There is no Reason to be a Wagie now; you don't get anything but Material Scraps, which was not the Reason anybody (but Slaves) ever worked before. Hell, Fuentes himself was smart enough to realize he would hate being in that Situation.
'The People will unite.' I don't think that. I think it will just be a Chaotic Rupturing of an Ulcer, where the People just do non‑ideological Violence. Or nothing will happen at all, and everything will continue as always—the Age of the Lumpen (more likely). But a Blue‑Red Union? No.

@Brandschatzer >I disagree with his Notion that all Left‑Wingers believe Nations should exist.
You mean "shouldn't"?
And also you're very much not the typical left winger so let's not be retarded and try to argue from your side please. The commie does think this.

>Nobody—nobody—has been clean in the whole Epstein Shit
>neither Side can claim they handled it well.
that's his point.

>There is no Reason to be a Wagie now
he explicitly mentions this problem. That's the moral hazard that the Left wants more of.

@Brandschatzer You're not gonna be able to square the circle of bemoaning lack of work incentive while at the same time advocating for more government handouts, but that doesn't mean Fuentes has the same problem. He clearly understands this very well and references the Econ Right-Wing arguments extensively. it's not just "a bit" just because you disagree. I don't get your point.

>Is it?
yes. There is no alliance to be had because the left is using the files as a hot potato, like the Republicans did when they were in power. Thinking that breaking with the Right and allying with them over it to attack the "Epstein class" is retarded when they are part of that class.

@WandererUber >You're not gonna be able to square the circle of bemoaning lack of work incentive while at the same time advocating for more government handouts, but that doesn't mean Fuentes has the same problem. He clearly understands this very well and references the Econ Right-Wing arguments extensively. it's not just "a bit" just because you disagree. I don't get your point.
I can, if my Idea is cynical and purposefully destructive.

>yes. There is no alliance to be had because the left is using the files as a hot potato, like the Republicans did when they were in power. Thinking that breaking with the Right and allying with them over it to attack the "Epstein class" is retarded when they are part of that class.
Agreed.

@Brandschatzer yeah well you were complaining that he didn't explain the problem enough or whatever. and my point was that he explained it well enough except if you really actually want more gibs and think that's good.
You don't want more gibs and think that's good, you want more gibs and think it's destructive which you want. I'm not attacking your position. But you've now admitted you do understand what the "problem" with it is and therefore his explanation should be sufficient for you too. I don't know what he should even have explained in more detail.