Timeline
Post
Remote status
Context
3
@WandererUber Unironically, very good Video. As a Left‑Winger, I will go through it from the other Side. However, I do agree with the Basic Premise: no, there is no strong Agreement—that is something People tell each other.
0:40–1:23: He is right. I am Anti‑War on Principle; Right‑Wingers aren't. I disagree with his Notion that all Left‑Wingers believe Nations should exist. Nation States, maybe, in such a Sense—but a Nation in the Sense of a united Ethnic Community, I support that.
1:50–2:01: 'White Supremacist, Crusader, Colonial Empire.' Pure Rhetoric.
2:08–2:30: That is pure Cope. Nobody—nobody—has been clean in the whole Epstein Shit till now, and several Right‑Wingers have defended him 'as a Joke.' 'Muslims'—specific Subgroup called Pakistanis. Epstein is worse than #MeToo by a Longshot, but neither Side can claim they handled it well.
Trans and Homosexuality Stuff: Yeah, still think that is gross.
3:50–4:18: Yes, that is a fundamental Difference between Wagies and non‑Wagies. But the Problem is, formerly, Society was actually transactional for being a Wagie—you got something out of it. There is no Reason to be a Wagie now; you don't get anything but Material Scraps, which was not the Reason anybody (but Slaves) ever worked before. Hell, Fuentes himself was smart enough to realize he would hate being in that Situation.
'The People will unite.' I don't think that. I think it will just be a Chaotic Rupturing of an Ulcer, where the People just do non‑ideological Violence. Or nothing will happen at all, and everything will continue as always—the Age of the Lumpen (more likely). But a Blue‑Red Union? No.
0:40–1:23: He is right. I am Anti‑War on Principle; Right‑Wingers aren't. I disagree with his Notion that all Left‑Wingers believe Nations should exist. Nation States, maybe, in such a Sense—but a Nation in the Sense of a united Ethnic Community, I support that.
1:50–2:01: 'White Supremacist, Crusader, Colonial Empire.' Pure Rhetoric.
2:08–2:30: That is pure Cope. Nobody—nobody—has been clean in the whole Epstein Shit till now, and several Right‑Wingers have defended him 'as a Joke.' 'Muslims'—specific Subgroup called Pakistanis. Epstein is worse than #MeToo by a Longshot, but neither Side can claim they handled it well.
Trans and Homosexuality Stuff: Yeah, still think that is gross.
3:50–4:18: Yes, that is a fundamental Difference between Wagies and non‑Wagies. But the Problem is, formerly, Society was actually transactional for being a Wagie—you got something out of it. There is no Reason to be a Wagie now; you don't get anything but Material Scraps, which was not the Reason anybody (but Slaves) ever worked before. Hell, Fuentes himself was smart enough to realize he would hate being in that Situation.
'The People will unite.' I don't think that. I think it will just be a Chaotic Rupturing of an Ulcer, where the People just do non‑ideological Violence. Or nothing will happen at all, and everything will continue as always—the Age of the Lumpen (more likely). But a Blue‑Red Union? No.
@Brandschatzer >I disagree with his Notion that all Left‑Wingers believe Nations should exist.
You mean "shouldn't"?
And also you're very much not the typical left winger so let's not be retarded and try to argue from your side please. The commie does think this.
>Nobody—nobody—has been clean in the whole Epstein Shit
>neither Side can claim they handled it well.
that's his point.
>There is no Reason to be a Wagie now
he explicitly mentions this problem. That's the moral hazard that the Left wants more of.
You mean "shouldn't"?
And also you're very much not the typical left winger so let's not be retarded and try to argue from your side please. The commie does think this.
>Nobody—nobody—has been clean in the whole Epstein Shit
>neither Side can claim they handled it well.
that's his point.
>There is no Reason to be a Wagie now
he explicitly mentions this problem. That's the moral hazard that the Left wants more of.
@WandererUber @Brandschatzer >That's the moral hazard that the Left wants more of
It's also what Wald wants, so he does qualify as a leftist.
It's also what Wald wants, so he does qualify as a leftist.
Replies
1
@Jens_Rasmussen @WandererUber True.
"Be a Nigger to the System."-People when somebody actually does it.
Not sorry.
"Be a Nigger to the System."-People when somebody actually does it.
Not sorry.