Timeline
Post
Remote status
Context
3
@TrevorGoodchild I thought this determined when they had their first child but this is just the age of parents determined by genetic mutation and averaged, so this says almost nothing about the mating habits unless I can find the distribution somewhere
@WandererUber Yeah I need to find the dataset. But it makes a bit of sense with late menarche due to nutrition (calories haven't always been easy to come by)
@TrevorGoodchild reading the paper rn and for some fucking reason they used AI. what the fuck dude
>Data on de novo mutations from 1247 Icelandic trios (14) were used to train a model that predicts the effect of both maternal and paternal age on the mutation spectrum.
they could have literally just done a bit of statistics instead... Why did they introduce randomness. are they stupid?
>Data on de novo mutations from 1247 Icelandic trios (14) were used to train a model that predicts the effect of both maternal and paternal age on the mutation spectrum.
they could have literally just done a bit of statistics instead... Why did they introduce randomness. are they stupid?
Replies
1
@TrevorGoodchild I'm a little rusty on how biologists do things but is THIS the confidence interval? Three+ years?
This makes the dataset a bit useless, no?
Again, rusty, but doesn't that mean basically any person from the dataset could potentially have been born to parents three to five years younger (or older), AND they don't even know who's siblings, whos the firstborn, etc...
Then the only thing this entire study tells us is that the average male-female gap was about 7 years...
This makes the dataset a bit useless, no?
Again, rusty, but doesn't that mean basically any person from the dataset could potentially have been born to parents three to five years younger (or older), AND they don't even know who's siblings, whos the firstborn, etc...
Then the only thing this entire study tells us is that the average male-female gap was about 7 years...