Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Context

4

First of all what is “culture”?

We humans have borders that divide us into tribes. The rules of the division are not always clear. Language? But USA and Australia speak the same language…
Same is the case for South Africa, England, Sudan, Botswana, Nigeria, Singapore, Namibia or Ghana. And some 100 more tribes:

French? Some 50 tribes speak French!

The fact is that there are many tribes that speak the same language yet their cultures can be totally different.

So what makes a “culture” is a soup of traditions, beliefs, religion, food, knowledge, art, clothing style, humor, sport, and so on.

A cluster of values that makes a group of people a bit different from another.

In that sense cultures are not only limited by borders and tribes, but they can form around a topic of interest such as gaming, movies, even celebrities.

Snippet from Culture Cancer - tromsite.com/2026/07/culture-c…

#culture #language #games #movies #english #french

@trom
Culture is downstream from race. This is why all European peoples, be they in US, Australia, or elsewhere have similar cultures. Africans everywhere also have cultures more similar to each other than to Europeans.

Although people may mimic or adopt cultures of another race, they cannot create or improve those cultures. Culture is created amongst a homogeneous population. Some people are capable of producing high culture and civilization from it.

Culture is lost when it is mixed into other cultures. If you take all the colorful crayons in a box and melt them together, you get an ugly grey.

@Bernard @Bernard @trom @Bernard There is no other race than the human race. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human

What is so similar between the Russian culture and the Spanish culture? From traditions to language they are very far apart. Or the Chinese culture and the Swedish culture.... Of course if you look deep down all cultures are mixes of other cultures, including the cultures in Africa or South America.

Do you really believe that there are different races of humans? That would be something ha....

> There is no other race than the human race.

I love this line because it actually runs contrary to Darwin's theory AT IT'S CORE.

In short, Darwin discovered that species undergo random mutations which make the more or less evolutionarily fit, and some flourish while others die out - leading to an "evolution" of the species.

Concretely this means that any given mutation "splits" a species into those which have it and those which don't. If the mutation is eugenic, then those with it compete better, if it's dysgenic then it's the other way.

If the human species is subject to mutations, then it has "splits", which means there are different "groups" (i.e. races). If it's not, then you don't believe in evolution.

Replies

3
That's taxonomy, which is inherently subject to debate. We might agree that the position postulated here is bad faith, but we can't formally disprove it.

However, a claim that there are NO competing sub-species existing within the human species is directly contrary to evolution. It is impossible to believe both at the same time.

So if you embrace "one race, human race", you are forced to either eschew evolution entirely, or adopt the Catholic perspective that it only applies to animals, humans are an entirely different physical construct.

This of course drives one-racers up a wall 😏