So the Clancy trial ended in a mistrial.
11-1
One dude would not concede on the "not guilty" verdict.
11-1
One dude would not concede on the "not guilty" verdict.
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Replies
11
@Tony because you're supposed to vote according to the law, and if there was any reasonable doubt...
@subnetter
Sounds to me like like the law wasn't applied, at least according to AI:
"The weird part is what the foreperson reportedly said about the holdout. According to the defense’s account of the foreperson’s note, he:
“has made statements acknowledging doubt but refuses to apply it to the verdict as the law states.”
That matters because the prosecution had the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Clancy was criminally responsible—not merely that she killed the children, which was undisputed. If the holdout genuinely acknowledged reasonable doubt about her criminal responsibility but still insisted on a guilty verdict, then he was arguably refusing to apply the law."
Sounds to me like like the law wasn't applied, at least according to AI:
"The weird part is what the foreperson reportedly said about the holdout. According to the defense’s account of the foreperson’s note, he:
“has made statements acknowledging doubt but refuses to apply it to the verdict as the law states.”
That matters because the prosecution had the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Clancy was criminally responsible—not merely that she killed the children, which was undisputed. If the holdout genuinely acknowledged reasonable doubt about her criminal responsibility but still insisted on a guilty verdict, then he was arguably refusing to apply the law."
Her demon followers will be back..
@Chzikken_1486 They're all claiming the husband did it now like a bunch of insane women. There was already a copy cat mother who murdered her children.
Idk what is wrong with them lol
Idk what is wrong with them lol
@jaff @Chzikken_1486 it’s like they don’t even read the trial they just listen to TikTok clips and radicalize themselves. Women are like lemmings - just follow the heard off a cliff
@jaff @Chzikken_1486 right? I’ve heard people talking about the consequences like if she does get “not guilty” women would start losing custody because if they have post partum they might be deemed unfit to care for children lol
There was no question of reasonable doubt that she committed the act because her defense did not contest that she did. The "reasonable doubt" in this case is whether her insanity claim can be accepted.
But if you accept her claim, then you probably also have to accept that most serial killers are also "insane" (after all, what rational motive do they have?). And at that point, the whole idea of "law" is severely compromised.
But it is anyway, we are living through a period of decline. The will of western society to punish rape (Rotherham), murder, child molestation (Epstein), etc is steadily fading. We're all living though Sodom and Gomorra before God's Judgement.
This situation is of course unsustainable. Men will not take up arms to defend a system which lacks any meaningful rule of law. So the powers that be will either change the system, or they will be replaced, and their replacements will change it. Even if we have to learn Chinese, this situation *will* eventually end.
And women's rights will probably end with it, because in times of struggle, the only people who truly matter are those who will decide whether to take up arms for the country or not. When all political power grows from the barrel of a gun, women, children, elders and immigrants do not have a say.
> Something something consequences of my own actions
But if you accept her claim, then you probably also have to accept that most serial killers are also "insane" (after all, what rational motive do they have?). And at that point, the whole idea of "law" is severely compromised.
But it is anyway, we are living through a period of decline. The will of western society to punish rape (Rotherham), murder, child molestation (Epstein), etc is steadily fading. We're all living though Sodom and Gomorra before God's Judgement.
This situation is of course unsustainable. Men will not take up arms to defend a system which lacks any meaningful rule of law. So the powers that be will either change the system, or they will be replaced, and their replacements will change it. Even if we have to learn Chinese, this situation *will* eventually end.
And women's rights will probably end with it, because in times of struggle, the only people who truly matter are those who will decide whether to take up arms for the country or not. When all political power grows from the barrel of a gun, women, children, elders and immigrants do not have a say.
> Something something consequences of my own actions
@jaff @Chzikken_1486 that is the one benefit - if women are deemed emotionally not liable for their actions - they cannot hold positions of authority because they may become hormonal and unstable
Genesis says that Woman partook of the Fruit of The Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.
Women are doing their damndest to convince us otherwise.
Women are doing their damndest to convince us otherwise.
God: Is there anything I can get for you?
Adam: Well, I can't suck my own dick, if you can take out my bottom rib that'd be perfect.
God, wanting to grant Adam his wish, but also punish him for his depravity: Let me do you one better.
Adam: Well, I can't suck my own dick, if you can take out my bottom rib that'd be perfect.
God, wanting to grant Adam his wish, but also punish him for his depravity: Let me do you one better.
@cjd @Tony @jaff @Chzikken_1486 genesis says that but all earthly evidence points in the opposite direction. Women have an animalistic intelligence level. Something didn't trigger them to think