RT: https://pkteerium.xyz/objects/574f6bb4-bdd0-4a14-935d-b4b8534adf23
Post
Remote status
Context
6RT: https://pkteerium.xyz/objects/574f6bb4-bdd0-4a14-935d-b4b8534adf23
The judges are elected officials, and they're just doing exactly what they were elected to do. If they start enforcing laws against blacks they lose the black vote and then they lose the election.
However, where it all falls down is when you ask "who is going to risk their life to defend such a system?" and the answer is Daniel Montano - but I'm not convinced that enough Daniel Montanos exist for it to be sustainable. And certainly a lot of them are about to get wiped out in Iran.
seems to have worked fine for bukele
You're right, it'll work if the voting majority is on your side.
Eradicating niggers is also effective
Replies
8So we can just assume point blank that this will never happen by way of a vote. So we're talking about a military junta - but that doesn't make reality go away.
If you're in power (in general), you probably have a couple of percent of real supporters, a couple percent of people who hate you, and 95% that don't really care. If you start talking about genociding a double-digit percent of your population, suddenly you have a double digit size resistance. Of course you've got all of them which are easy to identify, but you've also got friends, family, coworkers, whatever that aren't so easy.
And it's the nature of war that attacking is easy and defending is hard. The resistance will hit your electricity, rail, bridges, ports, and petroleum pipelines. They can very very quickly break your entire ability to govern.
AND that population has relationships with other people all over the world, who will put pressure on all other countries to condemn you, which will make you a global pariah.
Israel has a very easy job because all of the Palestinians are confined in certain areas where they can't do any damage, and they're not at all integrated in Jewish society. STILL they're having major problems trying to genocide them.
If you really really really really insist that there are people that need to be removed, the best way is to have someone else do it. This is what all of Europe did during WW2, and why they generally didn't bother fighting back. Europeans generally hate Jews and Germany promising to deport them, AND take the blame for it was too good a deal to pass up. All they had to do was sob about it afterwords and chant "never again"...
UK can't really claim to have "won" anything. In WW2 UK lost it's colonies, and now the place is well on it's way to becoming the South Africa of Europe - or perhaps devolving into civil war.
Unlike many on the fedi I don't think Hitler was a hero, but still, every western country right now looks like it's been defeated and is now being systematically destroyed.
Then WW2 and Germany steals all of the gold from every country in Europe, hides it in caves, guess who finds it...
US gets the gold, Europe in ruins, everyone agrees to use the dollar as the global reserve currency.
I call that a clever investment...
Yeah, much more realistic. Remap citizenship to match ethnicity. Multi-ethnic -> multi-national sharing a landmass. Work out who controls what territory (which cities, etc). Each nation can have it's own leadership.
Another model is you let the fake and gay government just keep on pretending to govern, but everyone clans up in private. This is largely what's already happening through ethnic mafias and interest groups in the US.