Egregoros

It is well known that Mossad runs the Pentagon. If a nuke were to be launched, it would most likely be one of ours used against an American city.

@Dagnar @caekislove @nihilvt @FourOh-LLC @cjd Appalachia

nuking an area that big would poison pretty much the rest of the world because you would need to use weapons that yield high levels of radiation to cover that large a space. Hitting a city where everyone is bunched together with a low yield gets more bang for their buck 180k I think it was in Hiroshima with one bomb. Does no good to blow up your enemies if the area is polluted so badly no one can go near it.

They don't care about using the area nuked, because only israel matters to them. That said, they will launch a nuke against a coastal city and simply tell us it came from a sub or ship outside the CONUS.

Using nukes of the level would affect Israel is my point. The radiation and fall out would affect everything.

Yeah. Nuking LA with a low to mid yield would make more sense. It's only about the psycho-shock value more than an actual attack. They already made noise about LA, and Lucky Larry Silverstein took out an insurance policy there ..

I was reading on it and its a myth that radiation would persist for thousands of years. It says life threatening radiation would dissipate in months not years. Says the idea the Earth could become a radioactive ball via nuclear war is a myth and cant happen.

If ALL the nukes launched were Tsar Bombas, maybe, but otherwise I tend to agree that the radiation scare was part of the Cold War propaganda.

@Dagnar @caekislove @nihilvt @Captain80s @FourOh-LLC @cjd @KingOfWhiteAmerica
Reminds me of the nuclear physicist that traveled the country to dispel the radiation myths. He host town gatherings and swallow a radioactive piece of plutonium that was supposed to deal a lethal dose to him. He did the repeatedly for several years. I forget his name though.

Exactly. I’m fairly certain from my own studies that the cancer risk from radiation is due nearly entirely to a parasitic infection, that is not shared by everyone. By itself, radiation is not harmful unless extreme.

The parasite in question is an “endobiont” that has viral “spores”, which then grow into bacterial and then fungal forms. The tumors are the parasite highjacking the body’s immune response.

The “endobionts” are more broadly proof of Pleomorphism - which upends standard germ-theoretical assumptions and topples the established medical paradigm.

I would be curious to see just how many established medical paradigms would survive close and open scrutiny?

Medicine in in the stone age. It's not my place to pontificate on How Biology Really Works, I just don't know. But I'm able to estimate by what they're capable of, how much they know, and the answer is not much.

It’s worse than the Stone Age in many ways. The field was wide open, and practitioners weren’t being blacklisted for finding things that work. It’s pretty much a military-type occupation, at this point.

There was a famous study in England in the 1800's that found that for the average person seeing a doctor was detrimental to health. I wonder what the outcome of that type of study would be today?

Eat right, exercise, simple meditation. That's the best you can do.

Of course you have to peel another layer back for a lot of people when it comes to eating right. All official communique on this subject have been errant nonsense for 60 years.

I believe that.

Big Pharma (Ozempic+similar) would disagree with you.

For obvious reasons.

I wonder how fat Amy Schumer's gonna get when she has to quit that shit for health reasons. Kelly Clarkson will return to the fat piggy she really is, too.