America
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Context
8
Whenever Europeans ask why Americans don't take public transport, it's like asking why The Emperor's New Suit never gets dirty.
Everybody knows the answer to that question, but nobody is allowed to say it.
Everybody knows the answer to that question, but nobody is allowed to say it.
@cjd@pkteerium.xyz Because the public transport in the Us is terribe and their urban planning is done by a retarded todler
But why is it terrible?
Who made public transport terrible?
Who made public transport terrible?
☦️
@cjd @xaetacore Public transport is amazing, trains will get you places faster and more comfortably than cars ever can. Instead of having the courage to address the nigger problem everyone just switched to cars and created a traffic hellscape.
Public transportation should be the only transportation allowed in society, and if you don't like it change the racial composition.
Public transportation should be the only transportation allowed in society, and if you don't like it change the racial composition.
I live in France, currently a rural area which is 95% white.
Even in Paris though, there is no issue with non-whites that makes public transport BAD. They're polite, quite, etc. French govt does not tolerate animalistic behavior from anyone.
Suffice to say, I'm pretty experienced with public transport - and I still prefer taking the car.
1. No waiting
2. It's not crowded
3. It's never delayed because of some technical problem
4. It goes straight to where I want to be
There's no change of racial composition that will really fix these issues. I think public transport ought to exist as an option, but in any society there are good reasons not to want that option.
Even in Paris though, there is no issue with non-whites that makes public transport BAD. They're polite, quite, etc. French govt does not tolerate animalistic behavior from anyone.
Suffice to say, I'm pretty experienced with public transport - and I still prefer taking the car.
1. No waiting
2. It's not crowded
3. It's never delayed because of some technical problem
4. It goes straight to where I want to be
There's no change of racial composition that will really fix these issues. I think public transport ought to exist as an option, but in any society there are good reasons not to want that option.
@cjd @xaetacore All of your points are purely a policy problem, rail transports cargo faster and cheaper (=less crowded) than road. Secondary transportation like tram can get you to your final destination. Wait times no longer than 5 mins if you do it right.
You can't complain about the crowding and not shitskinning in the same breath, they're the same thing.
You can't complain about the crowding and not shitskinning in the same breath, they're the same thing.
> Secondary transportation like tram can get you to your final destination
Well not to my house, not even a bus makes it this far out.
> Wait times no longer than 5 mins if you do it right.
Well, nobody in the world has really managed to solve that problem. There are places where a train comes every 3 minutes, but that's conditioned on there being a LOT of passengers to use it.
> You can't complain about the crowding and not shitskinning in the same breath, they're the same thing.
Well, no. If they got rid of all the non-whites, that would be less population. Less population means they send less trains because there's less people to ride them. But STILL when a train gets delayed because of some debris on the track or whatever, the platform fills up and then the train is crowded...
Pic: Japan back when they were still zero diversity.
Well not to my house, not even a bus makes it this far out.
> Wait times no longer than 5 mins if you do it right.
Well, nobody in the world has really managed to solve that problem. There are places where a train comes every 3 minutes, but that's conditioned on there being a LOT of passengers to use it.
> You can't complain about the crowding and not shitskinning in the same breath, they're the same thing.
Well, no. If they got rid of all the non-whites, that would be less population. Less population means they send less trains because there's less people to ride them. But STILL when a train gets delayed because of some debris on the track or whatever, the platform fills up and then the train is crowded...
Pic: Japan back when they were still zero diversity.
@cjd @xaetacore Then you can use your car from the station to home. Everything is a question of investment, if you want to pay bottom dollar for your train ticket, and spend thousands of dollars annually on your car naturally the car service will be better. But at equal investment rail beats car by a factor of 3.
And the Japanese are a special case, they have insane population density, and that's how they like it. Besides I wouldn't mind getting stuffed in with some cute girls.
And the Japanese are a special case, they have insane population density, and that's how they like it. Besides I wouldn't mind getting stuffed in with some cute girls.
Replies
1
Rail is a bit weird, it IS cheaper by the ton for transport of something like coal - but also there's a reason why long haul trucking companies don't go out of business.
In France rail is subsidized, and fuel is heavily taxed ($8 a gallon is the norm), but still it's cheaper in most cases to drive than it is to take a train. If you taking someone with you then it's massively cheaper.
In France rail is subsidized, and fuel is heavily taxed ($8 a gallon is the norm), but still it's cheaper in most cases to drive than it is to take a train. If you taking someone with you then it's massively cheaper.