So what I'm seeing here is.........
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Context
21
Let me guess, the baby was in CPS custody
Perhaps they took the baby from the hospital without paying the bill?
The hospital doesn't get to keep the baby as collateral like a title loan place.
Nah, this looks like CPS took the baby away from the mother right after he was born, and so the parents took the baby back and ran.
CPS loves to take White babies because they can sell them. Nobody will buy the black or brown ones.
Nah, this looks like CPS took the baby away from the mother right after he was born, and so the parents took the baby back and ran.
CPS loves to take White babies because they can sell them. Nobody will buy the black or brown ones.
My first thought also.
They're only interested in family unification when illegal aliens are involved.
So the child is with his father and mother - yet it's an abduction? From whom, the state? I have to stop here, or I will get too angry from what the hospital did to my wife and I with our youngest.
@tyler @MCMLXVIIOTG @Verfassungsschmutz @tiddlywinkler hospitals get no benefit of the doubt anymore. Until proven otherwise, it's some faggots on a power trip. I'm willing to believe the parents have the best interest of the child and the hospitals only care that you do what they say, and money.
This is a direct attack on the sovereignty of the family unit and I want the heads of all those who would attack it on pikes.
> You have a right to determine the course of your child's medical treatment unless the hospital, who is not a court, orders otherwise.
Is there actually any legal basis for any of this or is this just a new form of tyranny? Actually asking considering how much Talmudic nonsense our laws have become.
It happened to my wife and I two out of three deliveries. They threatened to call cps. In one instance when I went lawyer, they isolated my wife to ask her if I was abusive. She told them to fuck off. (I'm nice af to my wife btw).
I then went lawyer about their tactics and got my child and wife discharged immediately. I'm just glad my wife is savvy enough to play the game. I acquired discharge in the other case as well.
Nonetheless, this is common. I feel bad for laymen who don't know how to bait the doctors into fucking up, so you can make them sweat. Doctors are deathly afraid of malpractice, losing their licenses, etc as covid showed.
I then went lawyer about their tactics and got my child and wife discharged immediately. I'm just glad my wife is savvy enough to play the game. I acquired discharge in the other case as well.
Nonetheless, this is common. I feel bad for laymen who don't know how to bait the doctors into fucking up, so you can make them sweat. Doctors are deathly afraid of malpractice, losing their licenses, etc as covid showed.
@Humpleupagus @MCMLXVIIOTG @Verfassungsschmutz @tiddlywinkler @tyler @EnnaComa @WhitestTemplar what pretense would they even have to do this kind of thing? like what treatment are they demanding that you don't want? vaccines I'm guessing are a part of it
It doesn't matter. They'd just say that without discharge, the child wasn't cleared to leave. That's why I pushed in both cases.... "what's the medical reason the child can't be discharged." They usually say "were waiting to see...." in which case you ask "see what? Name a specific condition which requires current hospitalization or is likely to result in a life threatening emergency requiring immediate care in the next few hours (and in the first case... if it's so important, why isn't anyone on staff to provide care in such an emergency).
Like I said, in most cases they're trying to increase billing and can't give real justifications.
In the end you say, so you can't give me any medical justification for refusing discharge, so you must discharge. If you don't, there are remedies and you're not going to like them.
Like I said, in most cases they're trying to increase billing and can't give real justifications.
In the end you say, so you can't give me any medical justification for refusing discharge, so you must discharge. If you don't, there are remedies and you're not going to like them.
@Humpleupagus @MCMLXVIIOTG @Verfassungsschmutz @tiddlywinkler @tyler @EnnaComa @WhitestTemplar so it's literally just bureaucrats on a power trip eh? fucking typical
Doctors and lawyers approach matter completely differently.
The lawyer can think his clients an idiot, but the job is to find every rule and argument and tactic that facilitates the client's goal. The client chooses what he wants, the lawyer is a means.
A doctor chooses the ends and the means. He thinks you're an idiot and he knows best. So yeah... he's just an administrator, and you're not human. You're just a chart and tests.
The lawyer can think his clients an idiot, but the job is to find every rule and argument and tactic that facilitates the client's goal. The client chooses what he wants, the lawyer is a means.
A doctor chooses the ends and the means. He thinks you're an idiot and he knows best. So yeah... he's just an administrator, and you're not human. You're just a chart and tests.
And if a lawyer leaks things his client told him in confidence, he's disbarred for it.
For doctors it's the normal course of business.
For doctors it's the normal course of business.
There's no doctor-patient privilege. Subpoening that information is work-a-day for many firms in all sorts of cases.
Your insurer gets the entire file too.
Your insurer gets the entire file too.
And any little government / insurance / pharma "rat on your patients" thing.
The medical profession is a total disaster.
The medical profession is a total disaster.
In california, lawyers are only required to report if they believe there is risk of immediate bodily harm, e.g. murder.
Anything less that is illegal requires "quiet" recusal.
Where a motion is required recusal is basically "I have a legal reason" without more.
Anything less that is illegal requires "quiet" recusal.
Where a motion is required recusal is basically "I have a legal reason" without more.
The whole "no more secrets" thing re the other thread is going to eventually ๐ the medical profession.
That and also the fact that ChatGPT can already do what they do, but better, and the only reason they're still here is institutional / cultural momentum.
That and also the fact that ChatGPT can already do what they do, but better, and the only reason they're still here is institutional / cultural momentum.
Unless you need your appendix removed but that is probably just a matter of time.
Replies
1Yes. Currently surgery is still done partially by hand, but they're using AI robots to help surgeons already - so like the doctor controls what gets cut and the AI makes sure the cut is steady and smooth and do on.