How come we dont have satellites that drop tungsten rods like bombs? Seems it would work.
Post
Remote status
Replies
18I dunno solar powered engines? If that is even a thing.
Why tungsten if I may be so bold?
I saw a video about an alien invasion using low tech Tungsten rods to destroy our cities. It said something about it creating an explosion close to an atomic bomb dropped from that distance.
Captain: Search "Rods from God", it was experimented with at some point but they abandoned the idea because they're incredibly hard to aim.
OH cool thanks. I would think the guidance system would be the biggest issue.
So I think the conclusion is that hypersonics are cheaper
Define high tech tungsten rods.
Aliens on a budget I suppose.. 😏
The premise is dropping metallic spears through earth's atmosphere as a weapon of sorts?
Tungsten is vv heavy
But two problems:
1. Guidance is a bitch.
2. Getting them up there requires 1000x the energy that they end up releasing in the end because of the "you need fuel to move the fuel" problem that makes rocketry suck.
This guy's pretty bright and says that tungsten rod weapons are very exaggerated. I believe him.
The cost alone as it's fairly expensive to mine & refine first & foremost.
Learn something new every day..
The major costs are the insane amount of rocket power for the ride up, and the crazy guidance system that can steer without burning the flaps off on the ride down...
Yeah if that rocket goes out you just bombed someone below.
Orbital simulators like Orbiter 2024 can offer a glimpse at the complexities involved. The de-orbit is the easy part, but the rest would be a bear.
Hypersonics, at the end of the day, are cheaper to produce and quicker to deploy.
Usually they launch over unpopulated areas or ocean for that reason.
Thanks for the info 🍻
Note to self: Bioengineer space bugs that can steer asteroids