Who needs a Pearl Harbor when you have "allies" like this?
Timeline
Post
Remote status
If you somehow still think Churchill wasn't an absolute shitbag.
Who needs a Pearl Harbor when you have "allies" like this?
Who needs a Pearl Harbor when you have "allies" like this?
Replies
15
@BroDrillard Damn, I'd never heard of this. Not surprising that I haven't. Each time I read something about him I hate him so much more
@BroDrillard A bunch of shit just straight up false here.
1) The fleet was stationed in Algeria, not Southern France.
2) The British did not attack without warning, they engaged in talks with the French commander of forces for several hours over the demand to either sail the ships to the United States or the UK, or to scuttle them.
3) The British obviously didn't have the ability to sail the French ships away themselves, hence why they demanded this.
1) The fleet was stationed in Algeria, not Southern France.
2) The British did not attack without warning, they engaged in talks with the French commander of forces for several hours over the demand to either sail the ships to the United States or the UK, or to scuttle them.
3) The British obviously didn't have the ability to sail the French ships away themselves, hence why they demanded this.
Possible, I haven't seen any other documentation on what happened.
But if it happened the way you describe it, I do understand the French commander. Had he sailed the ships to the US or UK, we can be certain those ships would have been seized. IOW he was asked to hand over France's fleet to some other nation. No wonder he didn't want to do it. He probably considered it an intact fighting force that the Germans couldn't grab that easily. He didn't expect his "allies" to actually attack him. Killing the French sailors still makes Churchill a shitbag.
But if it happened the way you describe it, I do understand the French commander. Had he sailed the ships to the US or UK, we can be certain those ships would have been seized. IOW he was asked to hand over France's fleet to some other nation. No wonder he didn't want to do it. He probably considered it an intact fighting force that the Germans couldn't grab that easily. He didn't expect his "allies" to actually attack him. Killing the French sailors still makes Churchill a shitbag.
@BroDrillard forget not that without churchil vehemently shutting down every anti-zionist in the british government there would be no israel today.
I wish that black dog had caught him earlier.
Jews Communist and Bolsheviks.
Isn't all of that covered by, The Jew?
(blind squirrel finds a nut)
@BroDrillard "USS Liberty? More like USS LiberDEEZ NUTZ! Now watch this drive!" - Shitheel Churchill with a time machine
@BroDrillard I WILL NOT HAVE ANY OF THIS
THE FRENCH ADMIRAL IN MERS-EL-KÉBIR WAS RETARDED BEYOND BELIEF
HE LITERALLY DID EVERYTHING TO MAKE HIS MEN AND SHIPS BE IN DANGER, THE BRITISH KEPT TRYING TO COMUNICATE TO HIM BUT THE NIGRO WANTED ONLY TO TALK IN FRANCE, (which the British had interpreters) TO THE ADMIRAL IN CHARGE (That did not knew French).
THE FROG IS THE ONLY ONE TO BLAME BY THIS DISASTER.
THE FRENCH ADMIRAL IN MERS-EL-KÉBIR WAS RETARDED BEYOND BELIEF
HE LITERALLY DID EVERYTHING TO MAKE HIS MEN AND SHIPS BE IN DANGER, THE BRITISH KEPT TRYING TO COMUNICATE TO HIM BUT THE NIGRO WANTED ONLY TO TALK IN FRANCE, (which the British had interpreters) TO THE ADMIRAL IN CHARGE (That did not knew French).
THE FROG IS THE ONLY ONE TO BLAME BY THIS DISASTER.
@BroDrillard "Bro why do you refuse to count the English as white and want them in the same grave as the israelis?"
The English:
The English:
The only good thing Churchill did was cause a massive famine in India that killed more than 1 million Pajeets
> killing the fr*nch is a dark stain on bri'ish history
... But they're not even human.
... But they're not even human.
@BroDrillard a good reminder that if you fight for kikes, your life is that of a cheap and disposable goycattle
Oh wow i didn't know that