Egregoros

And the probably licensed the use of their likeness through the TOS.

>And the probably licensed the use of their likeness through the TOS.

"No, I didn't read it; I just clicked 'I Agree', because if I didn't, it wouldn't work!"
-Foid

Wait until their likeness starts showing up on AI-generated porn or worse, being put on a crime captured on a Flock camera.

I imagine moral rights will play into this when it's direct impersonation - to the point that someone could mistake it for the person...

But then they'll just mix 3 chicks together and they'll be back at it again, and nobody will have a claim on anything.

Foid 9/11 is when dumb videos with kissy-lips are worth absolutely nothing because anyone can generate them any time they want...

@Bernard >Woman attentionwhoring utterly in shambles
Sam Altman... I'm sorry that I ever doubted you. Forgive me!

Typically, if your likeness was used in an ad without permission, you'd have a right to sue for false light defamation, which can be quite lucrative depending on the product. Note "without permission", hence the TOS issue.

We don't have those type of laws here. I recall there are other protections in the EU and Canada. I can't remember what they are offhand though. I don't run across them often.

I think it's kind of a parallel to false light defamation, as you mentioned. In any case, even if there's no explicit law, enough angry people are a law until themselves, and Meta will have to back down - and just mix 2 or 3 together instead of using one specific one...

And that's real issue.

> It just kinda looks like you. Lots of people kinda do.

Once it's in the sorta-kinda category, IMO they're safe. When it's the "friends will think you acted in it" category, they're in danger...