Post
Remote status
Replies
24Hot take time. Not new; I've had this idea for a long time:
- There should be government-run social media platforms. (Maybe one per country, or per state etc., with federation.)
- These are a supplement to private-run ones, not a replacement.
- Every citizen has a RIGHT to an account with public posting permissions.
- The RIGHT to publish can only be taken away as part of CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT.
- Citizens sign up with their ID, so the account holder is known to the government.
- But the public-facing account name can be a pseudonym.
- (optional) You can publish "nameless" posts that are literally anonymous. Will only reach people searching for a topic, not sent to followers. The government can still look up who posted it, of course.
- People can mute each other, and choose who can reply directly under their posts. Quote-posting is always possible.
Why would this be a good idea, if governments were technically competent enough to implement it without glaring security or stability issues?
- Private corporations with an oligopoly over social media cannot implement mass-censorship of political opinions by using the "it's a private platform bro!" argument.
- Citizens become more keenly aware of what the *law* does and doesn't allow them to speak. If they find it too limiting, this motivates them towards political action to change the law.
- Perfect accountability when someone actually does post something heinous, like direct physical threats, direct incitement to commit a crime, uploading CSAM, etc.
It would have the potential of encouraging everyone to act like adults and partake in political discourse more seriously, because they can't cry to a private platform owner to have them censor unpopular opinions, but also can't post literal criminal shit.
having what is effectively a "generate porn of this person and send it to them" button under every selfie or photo anyone posts was a very bad idea and crosses a line that a very, very large number of people are uncomfortable with. it's more an issue with image generators in general than with twitter specifically but it should be obvious to see why making it so in-your-face would draw significantly more attention to this already very controversial topic. grok makes targeted sexual harassment effortless.
Years of specific propaganda? Censorship? Facebook knowingly mindfucking people with algorithms, instagram knowing it was awful for young girl, etc. Nahhhhh, it's all good
But putting people in a bikini? RED FUCKING ALERT
This is stupid
I can do it too, btw. I have a really good imagination. "Self, imagine Macron getting eaten by a pack of furries."
The average person isn't going to see that. They aren't personally directly effected by any of that in their day to day lives, as far as they can tell. Minor inconveniences at worst for a lot of people. You feel cute and post a selfie, and suddenly get flooded with AI generated porn of yourself? You post a pic of your kids and suddenly get flooded with dozens of indecent images of them? That's something the average person is directly seeing and which directly involves them. It's targeted at them, specifically, in a way that is going to cause an immediate response. It's not some vague concept that someone somewhere is being censored for something or other, it's porn of them being sent at them whenever they post any pictures of themselves. It drags the majority of people who just want to go about their day and don't want to care about any of these things into it and forces them to care.
who do you think votes
The UK has their current government BECAUSE they didn't vote because no matter what they vote for they won't get what they want
Once again, the government has not gave a single shit about the people, no matter who's voted in. It's a power play, the EU and co has fucking hated the American social medias for forever and instead of attempting fuck it over by actually legislating over the bad, this is what they go insane over, when they can't even clean up their crap locally?
I'm confused. Is Alex conflating a bikini with porn? ๐ค
I agree with you but I'm responding more to the comment about the grok scandal being absurd. If you can't see why that pisses off normies and more serious but abstracted issues like censorship doesn't, and why that outrage is a much easier option for governments to latch onto to justify their agendas, idk what to tell you
There's probably some miscommunication going on here, I 100% believe this isn't being done for the people and is just an agreeable justification for them to achieve a goal they've long been after. I just also believe the grok thing has caused a genuine scandal that people are actually upset about.
As for it being a huge scandal that people actually care about, I'm not sure I agree. The news media in general are hand in hand with the gov and/or they will run the most sensationalist juicy shit they can get their hand on, often leading to "this is a big outrage" being mostly fabricated and engineered to a degree, because the press shouldn't actually be equalled to "the people"
Maybe through mass AI-powered sexual harassment the Internet will relearn one of the many lessons it forgot a generation ago and people will stop posting pictures of themselves online.
https://off-guardian.org/2026/01/15/the-great-grok-bikini-scandal-is-just-digital-id-via-the-backdoor/
Don't have the auto-mod enabled? Good, now your instance is illegal in the EU through some obscure directive.