Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Context

8
The Citizen Vigilante saga the last week on Twitter has been phenomenal.

>People know it's retard kino.
>People start poasting piracy links.
>Director directly interacts with fans & yells out NOO DON'T PIRATE IT. I FUNDED IT MYSELF & IF YOU WANT MORE GO BUY IT.
>People say I don't want to give money to the distribution company.
>Uwe Boll says FINE, THEN PAYPAL ME $10 TO SUPPORT THE ARTS!
>Poasts real PayPal email linked to him for years.
>Donations flood in. :pepeSuit:
>Uwe Boll poasts the entire movie in full quality on X for free for *48hrs.

Nigga it really is that easy. Make good content, ask for money after so you can make more. Watch money roll in.

I am positive his distributor Quiver (yes they are :hands: ) is going to take well to him circumventing their deal to directly profit off of views. :laugh_derp:
I watched it. I initially gave it a 4/10.

It's a b-movie. I get the feeling that making Scorsese level work is just incredibly fucking hard, and the most that most people will ever manage to accomplish is b-movie level stuff.

That said, there's a huge subtext to the film, and if you get it then it's maybe more of a 5.5 or even a 6.

It's still a b-movie, but the subtext is nuanced and there's more to it than a plotless copy of V-for-Vendetta.
@cjd @pyrate @catmanmancat

the definition of a B-movie usually boils down to
- low-budget
- lesser known/uknown actors
- focus on a genre (as a consequence)

but no one can claim there are no low-budget movies with lesser known/unknown actors that have depth or quality to them. A movie can be low-budget, feature unknown actors, and still sweep awards at film festivals. It's not the budget, it's not the actors, Boll was always known for 'less demanding' stuff. And I wouldn't say this is his fate, it's his decision to do what he does. And to slightly defend him here, and others like him, if there is a time and a place for high art, there is also a time and a place for low art. Not every book needs to be a Dostoyevsky. And in the current cultural moment, his movie seems to have accomplished something.
That is because real action is actually very difficult to choreograph and requires hiring actual goons who naturally know things, using high quality props, having an expanded budget for multiple takes, multiple pyrotechnic uses and so on. Uwe Boll went with simplicity, but it was still one of the more expensive components of the film.

I don't really care about guns and tactics needing to be hyper real, noticing the slight discounts isn't really worth going down a purity spiral.

> tell the story
> resonate with the current demand for a genre

To be honest, Hollywood has taken a long hiatus from films featuring a vigilante hero. I do not include Marvel in this scope because capeslop others the protagonists from ordinary people. Even Bruce Wayne is out there dumping stacks of cash on new batsuits and being more liberal with each passing gen!

Replies

2
I could write you a movie that would make CIA goons shit in their pants because it would present a method of overthrowing the government which they have absolutely no answer to.

But the thing is, pitching a movie, and getting it funded and distributed, are two different things. If you want your movie to get from an idea in your head to film, you need to tell a story that vibes with people who have the money to make it happen...