Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Context

5

Ripple/XRP (a cryptocurrency company) just granted 200k USD to Social Web Foundation, "...to research sustainable revenue and operating models for digital publishers and community-run platforms":

https://interledger.org/news/interledger-foundation-awards-200000-social-web-foundation-support-decentralized-social-media

This means they will be able to influence the development of the ActivityPub specification at W3C.

For those who don't know: Interledger, WebMonetization and OpenPayments are basically the same thing, these projects were created by Ripple ~10 years ago in order to insert their cryptocurrency and related payment services into web standards. These projects are sometimes presented as independent, but this is a lie, they are not (not in 2019, not in 2025).

Needless to say, Ripple itself is a borderline scam: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonbloomberg/2019/03/01/is-ripple-a-scam/. It's not even a cryptocurrency really, their infrastructure is completely centralized and no one in cryptocurrency space takes them seriously. But they have a lot of money to bribe people, so I am sure that we will hear more about their adventures soon.

RE: https://socialwebfoundation.org/?p=99982

@silverpill

The grant is for four subprojects:

1. Fediverse sustainability. What are the economic, psychological and emotional pressures on instance operators and other infrastructure providers? How can we support them?

2. Creator economy. What social, organizational, and technical infrastructure do content creators depend on? What are we missing on the Fediverse?

@silverpill

3. Cooperatives. social.coop, cosocial.ca and data.coop are all great examples of coops on the fediverse. Does this democratic and participative corporate structure provide an advantage for the Fediverse?

4. Web Monetization. Many Fediverse projects have implemented this API. We'll be identifying two more multimedia projects and helping them use the protocol.

@evan @silverpill I'm sorry to tell you, but points 2 and 4 (lack thereof) are exactly why I would say most people that have been here for years, came here in the first place. To get away from corporate accounts spam and blatant attempts at engagement farming. The general lack of money making abilities on the Fediverse is why it is attractive to many. If you want an example of the hole you, and others, are digging themselves into, look at Twitter's monetization scheme and try to browse the timelines for a few minutes. Nothing interesting happens there, it's all engagement farming for a few Musk bucks every month.

And point number one reads like a point about moderation, which SWF has talked about multiple times, and centralizing it in some way. Which goes against the very point of Fediverse/AP and all decentralized social media networks. The fact that IFTAS is one of SWF's partners makes this even more alarming.
@evan @silverpill
>If you want an example of the hole you, and others, are digging themselves into, look at Twitter's monetization scheme and try to browse the timelines for a few minutes. Nothing interesting happens there, it's all engagement farming for a few Musk bucks every month.

Another one would be Nostr and "Zaps", which are very similar to what Twitter does, but directed by users instead.

Replies

1
@phnt @evan @silverpill YouTube monetization before that and how shittier it got
You can see how the wheels fell off the gravy train by looking at who was big then and now: then it was awkward let's players who could make enough to retire if they were smart
Now it's just mrbeasts soulless grin and he actually needs investors for his slop as opposed to a guy and a camera and a virtual bridge
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/15/mrbeast-company-gets-200-million-investment-from-tom-lees-bitmine.html