Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Context

17
@Waldbrand hm, then idk what the other 50 percent are.
Perhaps his takes you don't agree with? I found some of them stupid or uncomfortable before, but I've come around to most of them. Most recent in my mind was the Epstein stuff, which I'm thankful for, because people became really fucking rabid and insane in their rhetoric and I almost fell for it. They were all TALKING as if they really believed every single politician in the West regularly hunted and grilled infants but they were not acting like it at all. 3 months later, they moved on to the next outrage farm. I really appreciated that he was ridiculing the excesses, though him joking about it didn't sit right with me at the start.
@Waldbrand Yeah that's what I'm saying. It was weird but he turned out more correct than the others in the end. And it's obviously super unpopular saying that there is a difference between using 17 year olds and literally raping a child, and uncomfortable to hear, but there IS a difference and he was dead on the money that people did spiral into believing the latter, though there was zero evidence.

>I don't believe in Elite/Infiltration Theory
okay well maybe that's also something he will be vindicated on, maybe not. I like that he has an actual plan though, in any case. People accuse him of "not doing things" and then when you look at what they're "doing" it's just "raising awareness" so idk. Maybe, maybe not.

> I do like that he hates most of his Fans, I understand that.
it's a super funny bit and it gives me hope that his fans also understand that and can laugh about it.
@WandererUber @Jens_Rasmussen @Waldbrand So the years of nigh-homosexuality, of allowing Ali Akbar to stick around despite knowing he was grooming his underage followers, the gold trader sponsorship (owned by a literal jew), the "analysis" that's just him reading the Unz review or watching Ryan Dawson or whomever, his declaration that the "anti-israel stuff will pass like a fad", his previous defense of the "good jews" in his organization's staff (no such thing), his goading his own followers to enter the capital while not going in himself (not accusing him of being a fed; he knew entering was a bad idea but still had his followers enter anyway)..

All that just bounces off of you?
@lichelordgodfrey @Jens_Rasmussen @Waldbrand No offense to you, but what I also often feel like is people say this shit to virtue-signal, not to actually try and understand what I think about it. Did you ever consider the fact that any of those might be a malicious lie? Would you care if you found out?

Because I always try to, about the things I believe.
I could go one-by-one on any of these allegations if you're interested.

Excuse my hedging, whenever I did try to discuss Fuentes to find out what's there about the allegations, I remained unconvinced.
It reminds me of people posting that picture of Mike Peinovich in his home with the circle around the candles, if you know what I mean.
@WandererUber @Jens_Rasmussen @Waldbrand Nah, there's no point. You're as emotionally motivated to believe what you want as anybody else.

It's enough for me to never give a man the time of day if he actively consorts with, works with, and works for, jews. Fuentes does all three. I don't wanna hear the excuses for that. If the alternative for him by not working with jews is "not having a platform", then he shouldn't have one.

He is effectively a gatekeeper to misdirect young men. He's just a less coherent Charlie Kirk.
@lichelordgodfrey @Jens_Rasmussen @Waldbrand >no u
alright man


>I don't want to discuss the things I brought up. Here is my opinion, repeated.
okay but YOU asked ME what I think about it.

I asked
>Did you ever consider the fact that any of those might be a malicious lie? Would you care if you found out?
I guess the answer is "No I don't care"
Although I figured you weren't all there because you talk like an idiot, specifically you ramble on and on. You don't seem to have the mental capacity to imagine that someone disagrees on any step, nor that it is necessary to be on the same page to even discuss anything.
Like I said, you're only doing this to signal to others. I agree, it is pointless to talk to you.
Thanks!