Egregoros

@flux_the_cat This vindicates Frieren (the work, not the character) to some extent as it takes a stance against the "nothing is true" and "there is no inherent meaning in the world, fiction must continue to deconstruct all structures that imply it" crowd (this is the modern audience as a result of the modern Western tradition). With this, Frieren places itself on the side of the pre-modern tradition (see Tolkien), even if only partially. The issue remains that Frieren gives this without an ontology, without a metaphysics (God in heaven, the Uncreated Creator) that would actually justify Himmel's character and behavior. Instead it is presented as feel-good escapism culminating in private relationships (personal memory). I assume this appeals to many moderns as it offers shreds of myth without the detested baggage of religion, spiritual responsibility, and judging the self (repentance). But also without any substantial power to affect reality. Verdict? Tales for itchy (elf)ears.