Hillary claims Bill has 'no links' to Epstein, yet somehow rides on Epstein's plane were explained by her husband's involvement with 'charitable work'
What does that even mean?
This is nothing but futile attempts at damage control.
elston_
@elston_@noauthority.social
I'm here to BREAK THE ILLUSION OF CONSENSUS by using humour & parody as powerful lenses to reveal truths & lies, question narratives, & turn headlines into a form of civic satire.
Posts
Latest notes
No posts yet.
Benefits Summary:
For men:
50-60% reduced HIV risk
10x lower UTI rates in infancy
Near-elimination of penile cancer risk
Prevention of foreskin problems (phimosis, balanitis)
Lower HPV and HSV-2 rates
For women:
Reduced cervical cancer risk (via lower HPV transmission)
Lower bacterial vaginosis rates
Reduced STI transmission from partners
Key Studies:
Auvert et al. (2005)
Gray et al. (2007)
Bailey et al. (2007)
World opinion shifting after months of bombs? Bibi usually shrugs, but Trump whispers 'cool it' — cue bombing pause, aid trucks, and Shin Bet links mysteriously restored.
Perfect timing. Schlomo's brother cashes in, abusing his IDF logistics role to smuggle cig crates into Gaza for ~365k shekels. Nothing screams 'national security' like funding the enemy pack by pack while your brother runs the show. Family business thrives!
Wiener's thesis represents what historians call the "Sonderweg" (special path) interpretation of German history—the idea that German history logically proceeded from Luther to Hitler.
Wiener's book doesn't actually prove the connection—he shows similarities between Luther's and Hitler's views but doesn't demonstrate causation.
The fact that many German Lutherans supported Hitler while many others did not weakens the direct causation
Gordon Rupp published a direct response titled "Martin Luther: Hitler's Cause—or Cure" through Lutterworth Press in 1945, specifically countering Wiener's book.
Wiener's interpretation was common in American scholarship in the mid-20th century but was almost universally rejected by German historians in the 1960s who argued that Nazism was simply one instance of totalitarianism that arose in various countries, not something uniquely rooted in German Protestant culture.