Post
Remote status
Fetching context…
This post replies to something we haven't fetched yet. We'll try to pull in the missing thread context in the background.
In cases as gruesome and public as this, the National Interest is to make a public spectacle of the punishment in order to prevent copycats. This is the utilitarian justification for public execution.
Replies
10I'm not saying this is wrong, and frankly I don't give a shit about some shitlib from Massachusetts. But people need to be clearer in their message. Just say you want her convicted to make normie foids who make stuff up shut up.
I think a better question is whether we're better off for EVER tolerating a "not guilty by reason of insanity" defense. If someone commits murder because they're insane, perhaps they'd better be treated like a rabid dog.
If "not guilty by reason of insanity" is justifiable, then we should have data to show that insane murderers become beneficial members of society once they gEt ThE tReAtMeNt ThEy NeEd.
And if "not guilty by reason of insanity" is a reliable defense, then there is no longer law...
So I think it comes down to this: If you are not willing to burn witches for civilization, then you do not deserve civilization.
The real story is that all shitlibs deserve to be killed
https://www.nine.com.au/australia-news/melbourne-news-...
A Melbourne man who overpowered and raped an intruder will spend at least four years in prison.
Justice Christopher Beale described Holland's offending as premeditated and particularly humiliating.
"Your rape of Mr Cox was a callous, degrading and humiliating act of retribution," Justice Beale said.
I like to picture him smiling beatifically as he says this in a complimentary way.
>He was found guilty of rape but not of manslaughter
But that man was laughing the entire rape.
I was thinking of you as i read this
They left the front door ajar to encourage