Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Context

3
Random thought:

You're a professor.

Instead of giving tests, you give team projects.

Teams are anywhere from 2 to 5 people.

At the beginning they're picked randomly, so that everyone in the class has experience working with everyone else.

At the end of each project, you anonymously ask each team member about every one of their team mates - particularly, would you like to work with this person in the future.

After everyone has some experience with each other, team selection is based on approval. You work with the people you want to work with and who want to work with you.

Final grade is based on the grades of the projects you worked on MULTIPLIED BY your approval rating by your partners in the project.

You cannot cheat on approvals because if you approve people who actually are not helpful, you will end up working with them again (!)
What if the slut on the team realized that blowjobs = approvals?

This is just taking corporate performance management and putting it in the classroom. Could work and make it cutthroat, would also need to ensure competency of all members as in team projects you'll get the sideline cheerleaders.
I kind of don't even mind that. It's like saying in a warrior tribe, what's the role of the Shaman?

If the tribe is successful, I kind of don't even care.

Now I said teams are anywhere from 2 to 5 people.

So that means if you like working with her, you also like working with her in a group of two. Willing to do twice the workload with empty balls? That is still technically a group project.

And I believe that helping men and women learn how to collaborate together effectively is a very very high value skill that every school should be teaching.

Replies

2