Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Context

9
The Citizen Vigilante saga the last week on Twitter has been phenomenal.

>People know it's retard kino.
>People start poasting piracy links.
>Director directly interacts with fans & yells out NOO DON'T PIRATE IT. I FUNDED IT MYSELF & IF YOU WANT MORE GO BUY IT.
>People say I don't want to give money to the distribution company.
>Uwe Boll says FINE, THEN PAYPAL ME $10 TO SUPPORT THE ARTS!
>Poasts real PayPal email linked to him for years.
>Donations flood in. :pepeSuit:
>Uwe Boll poasts the entire movie in full quality on X for free for *48hrs.

Nigga it really is that easy. Make good content, ask for money after so you can make more. Watch money roll in.

I am positive his distributor Quiver (yes they are :hands: ) is going to take well to him circumventing their deal to directly profit off of views. :laugh_derp:
I watched it. I initially gave it a 4/10.

It's a b-movie. I get the feeling that making Scorsese level work is just incredibly fucking hard, and the most that most people will ever manage to accomplish is b-movie level stuff.

That said, there's a huge subtext to the film, and if you get it then it's maybe more of a 5.5 or even a 6.

It's still a b-movie, but the subtext is nuanced and there's more to it than a plotless copy of V-for-Vendetta.
@cjd @pyrate @catmanmancat

the definition of a B-movie usually boils down to
- low-budget
- lesser known/uknown actors
- focus on a genre (as a consequence)

but no one can claim there are no low-budget movies with lesser known/unknown actors that have depth or quality to them. A movie can be low-budget, feature unknown actors, and still sweep awards at film festivals. It's not the budget, it's not the actors, Boll was always known for 'less demanding' stuff. And I wouldn't say this is his fate, it's his decision to do what he does. And to slightly defend him here, and others like him, if there is a time and a place for high art, there is also a time and a place for low art. Not every book needs to be a Dostoyevsky. And in the current cultural moment, his movie seems to have accomplished something.

I'm okay with bad ballistics, I just want a police raid on a building to look like they're following some kind of a protocol. Having a detective rushing in with a bunch of SWAT team, standing around talking without having cleared every room, etc - it breaks immersion...

I can tolerate a little bit of bending the rules. If they needed the detective to be blown up, they could have had a camera / bomb in the wall that was remote detonated when he was standing there.

The worst offense is the scene with a whole bunch of cops rushing a fortified bunker and then standing there while he reads them some lame script and then proceeds to mow them over.

What I thought he was gonna do was take a position across the road and pick them off while they scramble down that ridiculously long super exposed one-person-wide staircase of death.

Replies

8
I don't think it (in its current form) has anything except "go" and "stop".

It's definitely not going to be fast enough for facial recognition, the goal is to see moving things and shoot them *immediately*.

One obvious way to make it safer is to limit its swing - so you can be behind it.

Remote control limitation is in battlefield scenarios, everything is subject to copious jamming.
@cjd @pyrate @rw Sniper scene could have been even cooler looking than the AK scene, and not just for realism purposes. Better yet, mixed tactics. Plant remote detonated explosives in the house, if the speech was really necessary, record it and play it over a speaker, proceed to detonate explosive charges and snipe the ones that were on the outside.