Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Context

5
> The word "multiculturalism" is often said with positive affect but the culture they're talking about is clothes, food, holidays etc.
> shallow culture
> But if you talk about ideas toward democracy, gender equality, war, medical experiments ... people HATE variety of culture.

This is a little bit out of date already - it's a professor saying it - but it's still a valid point, all the people who "want multiculturalism" don't actually want it...
The problem as defined is that culture is drifting off a cliff - evidenced by the falling birth rate, but also many other things. There's one big mono-culture and it's failing.

> One idea would be to break global communication
> Just have each county have their own religion and so on, and they can trade but they cannot talk with the rest of the world
> That would be a plausible route, but nobody likes this.

Replies

7

My opinion is that Capitalism can only function within bounds - because if it's unbounded then there's no reason not to just shoot and bomb your competitors until you have a monopoly, and there's no reason to even keep producing things when you can just just bomb and shoot everyone who refuses to pay tribute to you in exchange for nothing.

@cjd i'd say it's a function of high trust society, "free market" doesn't exist in a vacuum but in society.

you don't nuke your competition in high trust society because you also value not having to worry about getting nuked. only thing that has to be done is removing the 5% shitting in the pool.

the other ones will very likely cooperate on their own accord. i've had shops telling me to go to their competition because they themselves were out of stock, for example.

@cjd Capitalism has certainly proven to be the best economic system. Particularly when it's strengths are unleashed. The big problem we have not is that regulation tends to provide barriers to its strengths and amplify it's weaknesses.
One example, is disruption. In the short term, it can be quite bumpy but in the long term is a huge strength of capitalism, but most regulation favors entrenchment. If these regulations were in place in early 1900's we'd still be on horses.