Egregoros

Unfortunately that doesn't really work - they'll surly try but it's a dead end. You can't arrest a judge for judging, judging is their job.

The judges are elected officials, and they're just doing exactly what they were elected to do. If they start enforcing laws against blacks they lose the black vote and then they lose the election.

However, where it all falls down is when you ask "who is going to risk their life to defend such a system?" and the answer is Daniel Montano - but I'm not convinced that enough Daniel Montanos exist for it to be sustainable. And certainly a lot of them are about to get wiped out in Iran.

Genocide is difficult, risky, and unnecessary, just look at how much flack Israel has caught by wiping the Palestinians.

All you need to do is re-define who votes -> And a government that is about to be conquered will rationally give EVERYTHING to those best able and willing to defend it, including exclusive voting rights.

"Those best willing to defend it" means men, because women who can fight a war are too rare to matter. And it means mono-ethnic because multi-ethnic armies are a catastrophe. So you just have to decide which ethnicity is going to defend you. You can forget about minorities because there's not enough of them (by definition), and you can forget about ethnicities which are not known for fighting ability. So by simple process of deduction you end up with "governments survive only by White men's willingness to defend them".

If we declare that our price is that we must have exclusive voting rights, then we will.