Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Context

11
Iranian loses will accelerate now. (switching from standoff range bombardment to overhead precision ones. That's the sign that iran has a massively degraded aa shield). Having targeting eyes up close means easier detection and immediate strikes on tunnel entrances, mobile launchers, vehicles etc. Once that becomes the established mop of zog, ground troops will be prepared for insertion to iran because then cas will be possible. It seems zog is determined to take it all the way. Land war. At least that's what this suggests.

RT: https://poa.st/objects/b225d9be-f162-4eb8-9ba5-be389031f3cd
Israel can't bomb the drones and rockets, they're too dispersed and hidden in mountains.

What they can bomb is power plants and water treatment plants to create a humanitarian crisis - which you can bet they will...

Both sides are capable of creating pain for the other side, but neither side is capable of preventing the other side from striking. This war is wildly unbalanced in favor of offense - everybody loses.
@cjd @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @NoDoxGregBrady I think this is exaggerating things by a bit. It's conceivable that you could get some situation where a lone Japanese soldier is still fighting the world, and conceivable that rogue elements would commit some unwanted escalation, but Iran's mosaic defense doesn't actually seem to be a command for everyone to scatter and go rogue. It seems more like broad tactical independence with a lot of preplanning, so that the military won't just freeze up and become ineffective when command's killed. Statements like "every commander has three replacements" are not statements like "even the last Iranian recruit will flee into the mountains with his last rifle".

It'd be meaningless for Iran to deny having committed some attack for example, with all rogue elements, and there are plenty of attacks that are responsive to time-sensitive intelligence which must still reach people.
Well, you'd have three forces conspiring to make this happen:

1. Redundancy and decentralization built by the central government for continuity purposes.

2. Radicals in the IRGC who may or may not be interested in hearing about a ceasefire that is being called by someone who is not The Ayatollah and who they have never answered to before.

3. Israel who is assassinating everyone who even appears to be establishing themselves as a central authority figure.

At some point, they may truly run out of leaders, and at that point it is most likely to default back to 90 million Lone Japanese Soldiers...
@cjd @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @NoDoxGregBrady on 2. Israel's trying to do that, which again is evidence that all that what Israel really wants is regional chaos and failed states. A democratic and liberal Iran would still be attacked because it'd still in the way.

But Israel is not actually succeeding in doing that. It's a possibility, sure, and also there's certainly no easy win like "airdrop the Shah with a bunch of leaflets saying that he's your leader now, please stop".

This was supposed to be a four day war after all. Iran was supposed to be paralyzed by the initial attack. This whole conflict was supposed to happen a month ago with CIA and Mossad-fueled terrorist cells very rapidly degrading the government's legitimacy with a fake revolution. The train is fully off the rails.
> Israel's trying to do that, which again is evidence that all that what Israel really wants is regional chaos and failed states

Ya, I think (the crazies making decisions for) Israel want to cause what I said, and then force the US to send in ground troops or else face an indefinite closure of the Hormuz and subsequent collapse of the GCC and petrodollar.

Probably the most effective way to wind this down would be to make a peace agreement with Iran, support their government's ability to rule the territory, and give them nuclear weapons, so Israel will be forced to stop escalating.

Replies

0
No replies yet.