people eroticize all sorts of disgusting fluids when blood is literally right there
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Context
7
@nyx pussy juice is aight too though. I dont care if its partly piss...
@georgia you've never even had seegs
@nyx okay BUT i know what it smells like and sometimes it smells like food 
Replies
9
@nyx @azureazure @georgia @patchuun one time i inadvertently saw some smut that i think the author was posting somewhere as like a preveiw or something, idk, this was a long time ago
i didn't read it except i saw they used the word "tumescent" which is kind of a crazy choice to me, that's such a clinical term. i feel like that's like dropping "gonads" or "prostatic fluid" - actually it's very Crash
@nepetalactone @georgia @azureazure @nyx I fuck with clinical and otherwise flowery terminology in smut and dirty talk in general tbh but with that I think ive told on myself enough for tonite mwah good night everyone
@nepetalactone @azureazure @georgia @patchuun this honestly is the way to go as far as I'm concerned, because like what are your options really in writing about seggs? you can go the usual pornkaf route of using really crude and graphic language, which to me just smacks of like the expulsion of neurotic-repressive puritanism, or I guess write like euphemistic flowery bodice-ripper checkout line romancekaf trash novels trying to imitate Lady Chatterley's Lover. really, I think that the Ballardian style of cool and clinical detachment from the act itself described in mechanical terms of things a body can do is the only significant evolution of writing on seggs in the English language. however, you also have to be a good writer for it to not sound stupid
@nyx @azureazure @georgia @patchuun yeahh i agree - my memory of this particular example was that it was mostly pornkaf and just happened to use a weirdly clinical term, probably not intentionally