Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Context

10

@pepsi_man @miyagiyoda

Dude, unfettered Libertarianism would be a nightmare. You would have self-appointed arbiters of truth and justice who will have to morals of an ape meting out comeuppence.

As soon as Libertarianism hit, shit would go sideways and police would be conscripted all over again.

The dirty corrupt cops at the top love it when people throw out the baby with the bathwater. Because they can say, "See? They just hate cops."

There will always, always, ALWAYS be cops.

Replies

9
eh, cops do all kinds of retarded shit, they're blue niggers for a reason

by and large they aren't good people, and the ones who are get pushed out or have bad things happen to them, i've seen them give nogs leeway they would never give a white and they treat sociopathic criminals like coworkers almost

@a_gangstalker @pepsi_man @miyagiyoda

If people took their tickets without litigating on the roadside; if they accepted responsibility and opted to not have it happen again; if people were punished commensurately for their crimes, from the subject citizen's perspective policing wouldn't be in the crisis it is today.

But now people are SovCits about it and waste everyone's time. Ben Crump etc.

e.g: the speed limit's there for a reason. What's the argument going to do? Nothing.

i think sovcits are only slightly more deluded than regular citizens because at least the regular citizens have the organized force of the state on their side

it's prudent to be able to maintain standards but all of these have the minor caveat of not having to share a civilization with subhumans

we are openly ruled by people who fly to childfuck island and eat people jerky, in the face of that who cares about having a licence to drive or the authority of the state when it's a completely hostile and illegitimate entity

the legitimacy factor must be addressed before the idea of responsible citizenship can be even taken seriously
The main failure of SovCits is that they want to believe there is Rule of Law - it's just that the Law isn't what the average person thinks it is.

They're just not willing to accept the real black pill that there just is no Rule of Law. The "law" is a fig leaf over the true ruling power which is nothing more than bruit physical force.

killing or exiling enough bad people makes it so you don't need as many cops, singapore is a severe authoritarian society because it needs to be due to it's multicultural multiracial nature that lumps in 120 iq individuals with 70 iq ones and has to treat them all the same to hold it together

Notwithstanding the fact that the insurance industry is clearly corrupt, monopolized, over-regulated, and in need of reform; I am partial to the idea that places should be able to require the people in them to carry insurance which will pay out if they commit a crime against their environment.

I'm quite confident that the cost to someone like me would be a small fraction of my home-owner's insurance. But people who are unable to behave themselves would be priced out of entering those places - as they very well should be.