Timeline
Post
Remote status
Context
10
LIFE?
For getting a blowjob from and giving anal to Paul Pelosi?
Talk about connected 😡
For getting a blowjob from and giving anal to Paul Pelosi?
Talk about connected 😡
Meanwhile raping, murderous niggers get a year and probation
Random thought: It seems to me that an HOA could impose a rule: If a person who resides in or is associated with your house commits a major crime (rape, murder, etc) within HOA territory, you pay the HOA $30,000 for reputational damage to the community.
@cjd @DMA @UnCL3 @SmidgePierce HOA always sound like buzz kills. Corporate apartment vibes just with a fence and a yard
Right but in *theory* it should be possible to make one not suck, it's just that Americans are petty and shit at governing...
I suppose you could probably also do something like this at the city council level...
I suppose you could probably also do something like this at the city council level...
@cjd @DMA @UnCL3 @SmidgePierce it's almost impossible to control any territory as a group in the US. The federal system is designed to prevent that
Has anybody actually tried this exact thing with creating liability for people who introduce blight into a community via providing access to their property?
@cjd @DMA @UnCL3 @SmidgePierce Not that I know of but it wouldn't surprise me if it had been tried then got killed by a judge somewhere. Legal fights are forever when you oppose the regime on stuff and they out money you there eventually
Okay, but for that to actually work, the actual owner of the property needs to be involved. So you can't have some random leftoid parachute in from nowhere and sue you, because the matter is relative to the owner of the house which gets rented to someone who turns out to be a criminal.
Now they probably could fight it, but it's the kind of thing where everyone in town has somehow discussed and agreed that this is how it ought to work - and then if THEY put up a criminal in THEIR house and the criminal goes on and does crime, if they decide to then sue to avoid paying, they're really adding insult to injury... I mean, even if they have a case, it comes at the cost of alienating everyone around them.
Basically what they're doing by fighting it is saying "I have the right to bring criminals here and ruin the community for everyone" - it's a terrible look. In Europe people who are that antisocial have mysterious house and car fires...
CC: @Humpleupagus
Now they probably could fight it, but it's the kind of thing where everyone in town has somehow discussed and agreed that this is how it ought to work - and then if THEY put up a criminal in THEIR house and the criminal goes on and does crime, if they decide to then sue to avoid paying, they're really adding insult to injury... I mean, even if they have a case, it comes at the cost of alienating everyone around them.
Basically what they're doing by fighting it is saying "I have the right to bring criminals here and ruin the community for everyone" - it's a terrible look. In Europe people who are that antisocial have mysterious house and car fires...
CC: @Humpleupagus
Usually through the hoa documents or CC&R, the developer will restrict land use or require upkeep. The problem is the such provision can be easily waived as to all owners if not continuously enforced. And they rarely ever are.
Generally speaking, equity is greater than contract in such cases, e.g. if three other owners built offending structures and were never sued, you can build a similar offending structure.
Generally speaking, equity is greater than contract in such cases, e.g. if three other owners built offending structures and were never sued, you can build a similar offending structure.
Replies
0
No replies yet.