dont understand why you guys shill for ireland so much theyre just white people you should shill for someplace cool like india or thailand or vietnam
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Context
16
@georgia The Irish are European and Catholic and have been targeted by actual, verifiable, unjustified attempts at ethnic cleansing by The Bad Guys ยฎ for a very long time. It's only reasonable to like and defend them, they're our guys, and they were the first to be targeted in the way that all white peoples are now targeted.
Why would we be shilling for other races with historical problems we have nothing to do with? Neutrality is the reasonable position towards distant nations.
Also nice racism lmao "they're just white people that's uncool"
Why would we be shilling for other races with historical problems we have nothing to do with? Neutrality is the reasonable position towards distant nations.
Also nice racism lmao "they're just white people that's uncool"
@nerthos the amount of actual racists who are mad at my post just strengthens my resolve. if the irish are "your guys" I'm glad to think theyre lame. I have nothing against Catholics of course I think theyre way better than prots
@georgia You're the racist here though, trying to downplay the shit they've been put through because "they're just white".
"genocide bad when it's against me, but it's lame to complain about it when it's against whites", right?
The Irish are "our guys" in the sense of common continental roots, it has nothing to do with ideology. Anyone not insane would feel sympathy for a nation related to theirs be it in blood or faith that suffered repeated attempts at being wiped.
"genocide bad when it's against me, but it's lame to complain about it when it's against whites", right?
The Irish are "our guys" in the sense of common continental roots, it has nothing to do with ideology. Anyone not insane would feel sympathy for a nation related to theirs be it in blood or faith that suffered repeated attempts at being wiped.
@nerthos you are really overstating things the irish potato famine is only considered a genocide by some scholars
@scathach @nerthos sorry but all of you are just using modern revisionist history motivated by irish nationalism. I read the wikipedia article in full. feel free to be outraged by genocide is intentional destruction of a people.
@georgia @nerthos @scathach yeah, wikipedia doesn't call the Bengali famine a genocide either ๐ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengal_famine_of_1943
@OneRatOneVerySmallTrenchCoat @nerthos @rowb1t @scathach I'm very pro-india and no one can deny that but I'm not sure whether I'd consider it a genocide, I should read more about it. the Bangladeshi genocide is on there though which is proper.
@georgia @nerthos @rowb1t @scathach I am not pro India I pro the ethnic groups that are in the Hindi occupied occupied Indian subcontinent and I consider a genocide it was a fucking mass displacement of religious communities that existed In the same places for fucking years one of my grandmothers childhood friends starved on a British train
@OneRatOneVerySmallTrenchCoat @nerthos @rowb1t @scathach >Hindi occupied Indian subcontinent sorry but what the hell are you talking about
@OneRatOneVerySmallTrenchCoat @nerthos @rowb1t @scathach not sure why im talking to someome openly "anti-india" but the fact that you consider the Hindi people to be colonialists of any kind because of the controversial partition of india which saw death and displacement on both sides is certainly a unique take. they are not occupying or creating colonies in other parts of india that are tamil or gujarati or bengali. they are just a plurality of indians with a prestige culture and dialect. Hindustani people have prominence in both india and Pakistan, creating hindi culture in india and Urdu culture in Pakistan. do you consider Pakistan to be "occupied" by the urdu-speaking people? or do you consider Pakistan preferable because it has one major ethnoreligious group instead of india which tries to emulate a secular ideal (before modern hindu nationalism) while being pan-hindu and sikh and muslim? is there an article that states your opinion you could link me? I have mostly read about the history of india before British colonialism
@georgia @nerthos @rowb1t @scathach I consider neither to be to preferable because they are artificial states based on religion rather then culture? My family are from Punjab and Rajasthan at least of half of those people are like ppl that profit directly artificial that was propped by the British in what is India . I think ANY state based on religion and religious values is inherently fucked up Punjab is SPLIT IN HALF
Replies
6
@OneRatOneVerySmallTrenchCoat @nerthos @rowb1t @scathach oh it makes sense that youre punjabi the punjab saw the most violence and displacement from the partition iirc. I'm really sorry for assuming smh
@OneRatOneVerySmallTrenchCoat @georgia @nerthos @scathach yeah the state of India is pretty fucking rough right now. Hindi ethnonationalism fueled by fears of the CCP on their doorstep.
@rowb1t @nerthos @OneRatOneVerySmallTrenchCoat @scathach I dont see anything wrong with state religions including in states like iran as long as they dont enforce their laws that dont proscribe against evil in itself and the religion is non compulsory but I agree that the BJP is bad. killing animals is bad but killing people for killing cows is adharmic.