Egregoros

It's difficult to ask people to do terrorism, because it puts everything on the line, the benefit is uncertain, the fallout can be difficult to predict. You don't want to shoot up a mosque, synagogue, board meeting, leftoid party, etc. and then sit in prison thinking you should've shot up the other. Breivik, Tarrant, Bowers, did the right thing at the right time and are celebrated, there's a dozen others who bungled it and you don't even know their names. Terrorism is high-risk, high-reward.

Sabotagism is low-risk, medium-reward. If you do it right the chances of getting caught are virtually zero. UK Blade Runners have proven that, uninstalling literal security cameras. It requires even less political consensus than terrorism (you just need to be anti-system). Sabotagism is the ideal way of fighting back, the only hurdle is most people lack the technical know-how and those with the technical know-how lack the conviction, and we can fix both of these.

Remember: once the system collapses you can kill shitskins/CEOs at will and there will be no police to catch you.

Good analysis.

Risk of getting caught is low because there's no motive. Motive is really important to a detective, woman dies -> what was her husband doing at the time? Something happens that EVERYONE wants to happen, whose the prime suspect? Everyone?

Not getting caught comes down to:
1. Don't bring your phone (doofus) remember 2000 Mules. If you wanna be a fucking James Bond, go buy a phone off a pickpocket and bring that with you...
2. Don't drive a car with a GSM in it (newer cars). Some cars it's possible to remove, look into this even if you're not doing Recreational Activities.
3. If you're insanely paranoid, work when it's cloudy because it's *theoretically* possible that spy satellites can be watching - but this is pretty far fetched... Anyway optics are gone when there are clouds...